Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Sally Levy Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$173k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$157kPhilanthropy$134kCivil Rights$54kHuman Services$50kEducation$46kCommunity Improvement$25kFood & Nutrition$19kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $147k
$6,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION$49,000
AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY$30,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$15,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$15,000
MINNESOTA OPERA$15,000
OPERA THEATRE ST LOUIS$12,786
SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL$10,000
CONGREGATION TEMPLE ISRAEL$6,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$5,000
ACLU$3,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$3,000
ELCA WORLD HUNGER$3,000
OPERA PHILADELPHIA$2,000
ST OLAF COLLEGE$2,000
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EAST PHILLIPS NEIGHBORHOOD INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$449k · 12 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$449k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+45%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +11%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +44%
  • OPERA PHILADELPHIA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • EP
    EAST PHILLIPS NEIGHBORHOOD INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +45%
  • RA
    REGIONAL ARTS COMMISSION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • JS
    JAZZ ST LOUIS EDUCATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
4
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
7
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
11
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
12
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Olaf College; the most unlike its peers is East Phillips Neighborhood Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION: $134,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONOPERA THEATRE ST LOUIS: $76,286 · OtherOPERA THEATRE ST LOUISLUTHERAN SERVICES MN: $50,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SERVICES MNSHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $40,000 · OtherSHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL+6 more: $37,000 · Other+6 moreAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationAUGSBURG …CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationThe Minnesota Opera: $29,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $7,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $35,000 · Civil RightsEAST PHILLIPS NEIGHBORHOOD INSTITUTE: $25,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $11,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$337,286Education$44,000Arts & Culture$36,000Civil Rights$35,000Human Services$25,000Community Improvement$15,000Food & Nutrition$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Minnesota Opera: $29,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEAST PHILLIPS NEIGHBORHOOD INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds The Minnesota Opera ↗
  • Who funds EAST PHILLIPS NEIGHBORHOOD INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds OPERA PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Sally Levy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Sally Levy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Sally Levy Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph