Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Rachel King Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$23kEducation$16kHealth$15kHuman Services$11kCivil Rights$11kPhilanthropy$10kEnvironment$9kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$254k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROUND HOUSE THEATRE$5,000
CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA$4,000
SNAP$3,000
AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE - SILVER THEATER - 2023 PAID IN 2024$3,000
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION$3,000
HOUSE OF RUTH - 2023 PAID IN 2024$3,000
HOUSE OF RUTH$3,000
NEW AMERICA$3,000
BETHESDA CARES$2,000
BETHESDA CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD$2,000
C & O CANAL TRUST$2,000
FRIENDS OF DARMOUTH ROWING DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$2,000
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION - 2023 PAID IN 2024$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE MINDFULNESS CENTER: $5k → 8%THE MINDFULNESS CENTER: $3k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 11 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -39% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$70k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-39%

Still filing today

82%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOUSE OF RUTH
    3× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +37%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $9k · revenue +6%
  • WF
    WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TW
    The William S Baer Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • HG
    HORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +27%
  • TI
    THIS IS WHAT WE DID
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dc Policy Center

The mission of the d.c. policy center is to arm decision makers with fact-based, unbiased, and reliable research and analyses to help create a vibrant local economy that can maximize opportunities for residents, workers, and businesses in…

Public Benefit
2
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
3
Sustained Dialogue Institute

Sustained dialogue develops leaders able to transform differences into the strong relationships essential to equitable decision-making, democratic governance, and peace.

Philanthropy
4
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
5
District of Columbia Arts Center

The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…

Arts & Culture
6
Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media

Transforming global storytelling by using data-driven research, education, and advocacy to mitigate bias, inspiring authentic portrayals in entertainment, advertising, and gaming that reflect the true diversity of the population.

Civil Rights
7
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

—
8
Historical Society of Washington Dc dba Dc History Center

The DC History Center deepens understanding of our city to connect, empower, and inspire. We engage with neighborhoods across DC and elevate the stories of Washington's diverse people, communities, and institutions. We aim to do this work…

—
9
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
10
Center Stage Associates Inc

See schedule o.inspired by our home city, baltimore center stage acts as a cultural catalyst for all communities to access theater in every form and engage in compelling conversations. programming: capture the collective imagination and…

Arts & Culture
11
Northwest Film Forum

Northwest Film Forum incites public dialogue and creative action through collective cinematic experiences. A nonprofit film and arts center located in Seattle, Northwest Film Forum presents hundreds of films, festivals, community events,…

Arts & Culture
12
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New America Foundation; the most unlike its peers is This Is What We Did. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA: $11,000 · OtherCITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINAFRIENDS OF DARMOUTH ROWING DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $3,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF DARMOUTH ROWING DARTMOUTH COLLEGESNAP: $3,000 · OtherSNAPHOUSE OF RUTH - 2023 PAID IN 2024: $3,000 · OtherHOUSE OF RUTH - 2023 PAID IN 2024AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE - SILVER THEATER - 2023 PAID IN 2024: $3,000 · OtherAMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE - SILVER THEATER - 2023 P…NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherNEW AMERICA FOUNDATIONJung Society of Washington: $2,000 · OtherWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · OtherWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INCHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $7,500 · OtherHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC+5 more: $6,500 · Other+5 moreTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $8,500 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN FILM…ROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureROUND HOUSE THEAT…DOCS IN PROGRESS INC: $2,750 · Arts & CultureDOCS IN PROGRESS …Denis Theatre Foundation: $1,250 · Arts & CultureDenis Theatre Fou…HOUSE OF RUTH: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF R…The William S Baer School: $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Willi…THE MINDFULNESS CENTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE MINDF…BETHESDA CARES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesBETHESDA …SURVIVORS NETWORK OF THOSE ABUSED BY PRIESTS: $6,000 · HealthSURVIVORS…BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $3,500 · HealthBETHESDA-…C&O CANAL TRUST INC: $6,500 · EnvironmentTHIS IS WHAT WE DID: $2,000 · Environment
Other$50,500Arts & Culture$17,500Housing & Shelter$11,000Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$9,500Health$9,500Environment$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe William S Baer School: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MINDFULNESS CENTER INC: $7,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetC&O CANAL TRUST INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSURVIVORS NETWORK OF THOSE ABUSED BY PRIESTS: $6,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOCS IN PROGRESS INC: $2,750 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJung Society of Washington: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHIS IS WHAT WE DID: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCenter for Humane Technology: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDenis Theatre Foundation: $1,250 over 1y, 6.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nora Roberts FoundationMD15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nora Roberts Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Rachel King Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Rachel King Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Bethesda Cares Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Round House Theatre Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John and Rachel King Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to John and Rachel King Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Rachel King’s filings →

More from the funding graph