Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Orah Brandt Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$2.6MEducation$2.5MReligion$1.6MCommunity Improvement$561kRecreation & Sports$395kYouth Development$303kHealth$205kHousing & Shelter$191kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $408k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$180,000
NAMPA SALVATION ARMY$150,000
QUAKER HILL CONFERENCE$145,000
BOISE RESCUE MISSION$100,000
NAMPA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$100,000
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY$100,000
IDAHO FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC$100,000
INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK$90,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$86,000
LOVE INC$80,000
BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER$55,000
STANTON HEALTHCARE$50,000
COLLEGE OF WESTERN IDAHO$35,000
LAUNCH MINISTRIES$35,000
YOUNGLIFE$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $645k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOPE HOUSE: $70k → 13%HOPE HOUSE: $70k → 13%HOPE HOUSE: $50k → 13%HOPE HOUSE INC: $25k → 13%HOPE HOUSE: $25k → 13%HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 13%HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 13%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $90k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $75k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $50k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $45k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $40k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $30k → 11%INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $10k → 11%BECAUSE INTERNATIONAL CORP: $10k → 11%BECAUSE INTERNATIONAL CORP: $10k → 11%BECAUSE INTERNATIONAL CORP: $10k → 11%BECAUSE INTERNATION CORP: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.7M · 40 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
6

Total granted

$8.7M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+16%

Still filing today

43%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NN
    NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $605k · revenue +32%
  • IF
    IDAHO FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $556k · revenue +37%
  • NC
    NAMPA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $512k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • IF
    IDAHO FREEDOM FOUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • BS
    BOISE ST UNIV FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth With a Mission Boise Cascade Inc

To work towards the great commission both locally and globally by partnering with the church to mobilize, equip, send and care for short-term teams and long-term workers who will take the gospel to the unreached.

Religion
2
Building Hope Idaho Inc
Philanthropy
3
Harvest Church Idaho Inc

Providing religious service for adults and youths

Religion
4
Boise Bible College Inc

To provide college training to men and women planning to enter the christian ministry throughout the world.

Education
5
Sage International School of Boise

Public education (local education agency) - sage international school engages students within an inclusive ib learning community, challenging all members to take risks and contribute locally and globally through open-minded inquiry.

Education
6
Underdogs Boise
Arts & Culture
7
North Idaho Christian School

To train christian leaders and students who will serve god and man in whatever setting god places them as young adults.

Education
8
Cole Valley Christian Schools Inc

Partnering with christian families to shepherd and challenge students toward their individual potential to impact the world for jesus christ.

Education
9
Indian Bible College

Ibc exists to empower indigenous christ-followers for ministry to the nations. in order to accomplish this purpose, the goals of indigenous bible college are: 1) to provide the necessary training for accurate interpretation of gods word so…

Education
10
Child Evangelism Fellowship of Idaho

Bible-centered, interdenominational, organization, composed of born-again believers whose purpose and mission are to evangelize boys and girls with the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ, disciple them in the Word of God, and establish them…

—
11
North Idaho Stem Charter Academy Inc

To provide a challenging learning environment in science, technology, engineering, and math, which maximizes individual potential and ensures students are well-equipped to meet the challenges in the world around them.

Education
12
Incline Schools Academic Excellence Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nampa Christian Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is Biblical Studies Center Inc the Biblical Studies Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAMPA SALVATION ARMY: $670,000 · OtherNAMPA SALVATION ARMYLOVE INC: $620,000 · OtherLOVE INCBOISE RESCUE MISSION: $508,000 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSIONFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $332,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESQUAKER HILL CONFERENCE INC: $295,000 · OtherQUAKER HILL CONFERENCE INCCOLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $292,000 · OtherCOLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLCOLLEGE OF WESTERN IDAHO: $248,000 · OtherMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP: $210,000 · OtherSTANTON HEALTHCARE: $205,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE RESCUE MISSION: $191,000 · OtherYOUNGLIFE: $161,000 · Other+17 more: $1,024,000 · Other+17 moreNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $605,000 · EducationNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVE…NAMPA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $512,000 · EducationNAMPA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS …Boise State University Foundation Inc: $402,294 · EducationBoise State University F…THE AMBROSE SCHOOL INC: $193,000 · EducationTHE AMBROSE SCHOOL INCLIFES KITCHEN INC: $82,000 · EducationCARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE INC: $80,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $340,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE INC: $270,000 · Human ServicesBecause International Corp: $35,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC: $556,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $5,000 · Community ImprovementBIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER INC THE BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER: $440,000 · ReligionYOU GOTTA ASK INC: $75,000 · ReligionINSPIRE IDAHO INC: $40,000 · ReligionLAUNCH MINISTRIES INC: $163,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $138,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASCADE LAKE 4-H CAMP INC: $62,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOISE PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $70,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$4,756,000Education$1,874,294Human Services$645,000Community Improvement$561,000Religion$555,000Youth Development$363,500Arts & Culture$70,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $605,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC: $556,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetNAMPA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $512,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER INC THE BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER: $440,000 over 8y, 42% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc: $402,294 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK: $340,000 over 7y, 52% of budgetHOPE HOUSE INC: $270,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetTHE AMBROSE SCHOOL INC: $193,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLAUNCH MINISTRIES INC: $163,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $138,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetLIFES KITCHEN INC: $82,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE INC: $80,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetYOU GOTTA ASK INC: $75,000 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetBOISE PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $70,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCASCADE LAKE 4-H CAMP INC: $62,500 over 7y, 10% of budgetINSPIRE IDAHO INC: $40,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetBecause International Corp: $35,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMPA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER INC THE BIBLICAL STUDIES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMBROSE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUNCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFES KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOU GOTTA ASK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOISE PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE LAKE 4-H CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRE IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds Because International Corp ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harold E & Phyllis S Thomas FoundationID26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harold E & Phyllis S Thomas Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Larry and Marianne Williams Family Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Smeed Memorial Foundation · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Orah Brandt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Orah Brandt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John & Orah Brandt Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John & Orah Brandt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Orah Brandt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph