Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Miki Ford Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$488kCivil Rights$90kArts & Culture$41kEducation$31kYouth Development$26kHuman Services$18kPublic Benefit$9kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$3,900
Median grant
8
States reached
$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT LUKE PRODUCTIONS$13,000
CALIFORNIA YOUTH SERVICES$6,000
CARMELITE SISTERS$5,030
THE GUIDING STAR PROJECT$5,000
ARIZONA RIGHT TO LIFE$5,000
ST BERNADETTE CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,900
UNIVERSITY OF MARY$2,500
STUDENTS FOR LIFE$2,500
BEVERLY CULTURAL CENTER$2,000
THE PENINSULA FOUNDATION$2,000
LEGATUS$1,490
SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE GUIDING STAR PROJECT: $5k → 11%THE GUIDING STAR PROJECT: $3k → 11%MARY'S PATH: $2k → 10%MARY'S PATH: $1k → 10%MARY'S PATH: $1k → 10%OBRIA GROUP: $3k → 10%CALIFORNIA YOUTH SERVICES: $7k → 10%CALIFORNIA YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 10%CALIFORNIA YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 10%CALIFORNIA YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
MN
MI
NY
OR
WY
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$792k · 34 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
25

Total granted

$792k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+37%

Still filing today

47%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NAPA INSTITUTE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $83k · revenue +65%
  • Augustine Institute Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $70k · revenue +192%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    2× · 2019–2020 · $27k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • OD
    OPUS DEI (LEONINE FORUM)
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • JUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +37%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE TORONTO ORATORY
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
2
Ave Maria University Inc

University education grounded in the traditions and faith of the roman catholic church

Education
3
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
4
Collegium Institute

Collegium Institute is a Catholic intellectual apostolate that fosters the Catholic intellectual tradition within the University of Pennsylvania community and within the greater region and secular academia. (Continued on Sch. O)

—
5
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
6
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
7
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
8
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
9
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
10
St John's University New York

St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education (continued on schedule o).

Education
11
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
12
Lumen Christi Institute

To make the catholic intellectual tradition a vital part of the culture of universities. to enrich academic communities at the university of chicago, across the nation, and the world with the insights of catholic thought. to dialogue with…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ethics and Public Policy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is California Youth Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BECKET: $95,500 · OtherBECKETST MICHAEL'S ABBEY: $91,800 · OtherST MICHAEL'S ABBEYMAGIS CENTER: $80,000 · OtherMAGIS CENTERCARMELITE SISTERS: $46,280 · OtherCARMELITE SISTERSCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE (CLI): $40,000 · OtherCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE (CLI)Individual grant recipient: $23,724 · OtherOPUS DEI (LEONINE FORUM): $20,000 · OtherST BERNADETTE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $18,500 · Other+28 more: $129,889 · Other+28 moreTHE NAPA INSTITUTE: $83,016 · ReligionTHE NAPA INSTITU…Sacred Story Institute: $11,000 · ReligionSacred Story Ins…Legatus: $9,647 · ReligionLegatusFRIENDS OF THE TORONTO ORATORY: $8,800 · ReligionFRIENDS OF THE T…KINGDOM ALLIANCE BUILDERS: $8,000 · ReligionKINGDOM ALLIANCE…THE LEONINE FORUM INC: $6,740 · Religion+3 more: $3,500 · ReligionAugustine Institute Inc: $70,000 · EducationAugustine I…University of Mary: $9,000 · EducationUniversity …Wyoming Catholic College: $7,500 · EducationWyoming Cat…TALLER SAN JOSE HOPE BUILDERS: $4,680 · Education+2 more: $600 · EducationALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $26,667 · Civil RightsStudents for Life of America Inc: $18,600 · Civil RightsARIZONA RIGHT TO LIFE: $5,000 · Civil RightsCalifornia Youth Services: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE GUIDING STAR PROJECT: $7,793 · Human ServicesMARY'S SHELTER: $3,750 · Human ServicesTHE OBRIA GROUP INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSAINT LUKE PRODUCTIONS INC: $15,750 · Arts & CultureJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $12,500 · Arts & CultureETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER INC: $7,500 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,250 · Public Benefit
Other$545,693Religion$130,703Education$91,780Civil Rights$50,267Human Services$39,043Arts & Culture$28,250Public Benefit$8,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NAPA INSTITUTE: $83,016 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $26,667 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Youth Services: $25,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $18,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT LUKE PRODUCTIONS INC: $15,750 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSacred Story Institute: $11,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetLegatus: $9,647 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Mary: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE TORONTO ORATORY: $8,800 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetPENINSULA FOUNDATION INC: $8,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKINGDOM ALLIANCE BUILDERS: $8,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE GUIDING STAR PROJECT: $7,793 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWyoming Catholic College: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEONINE FORUM INC: $6,740 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $6,527 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTALLER SAN JOSE HOPE BUILDERS: $4,680 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARY'S SHELTER: $3,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRIESTS FOR LIFE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OBRIA GROUP INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOODLAWN FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIANI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Culture Project International: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBenedictine College: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST THINGS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NAPA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds California Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LUKE PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Sacred Story Institute ↗
  • Who funds Legatus ↗
  • Who funds University of Mary ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE TORONTO ORATORY ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM ALLIANCE BUILDERS ↗
  • Who funds THE GUIDING STAR PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Wyoming Catholic College ↗
  • Who funds ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEONINE FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA RIGHT TO LIFE ↗
  • Who funds TALLER SAN JOSE HOPE BUILDERS ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S SHELTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Napa Institute FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Napa Institute Foundation · Angels Among US Inc · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Robert and Bernarda Neal Foundation · The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Miki Ford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Miki Ford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John and Miki Ford Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John and Miki Ford Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Miki Ford’s filings →

More from the funding graph