Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Melissa Besse Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$357k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.2MEducation$751kPublic Safety & Disaster$350kPublic Benefit$311kEnvironment$188kArts & Culture$126kHuman Services$99kHealth$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $167k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN TECH FD$110,000
TREES FOR TOMORROW$56,500
MARQUETTE CITY BAND$45,000
GLADSTONE PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT$13,200
PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY$13,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF DELTA COUNTY$10,000
BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP$10,000
LAKEVIEW CEMETERY$8,000
UP STATE FAIR AUTHORITY$5,000
TRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR$5,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL OF ESCANABA$5,000
NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
HOLY NAME CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
BONIFAS FINE ART CENTER$5,000
BAY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $13k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $10k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $10k → 13%TRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC: $10k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $5k → 13%TRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $5k → 13%TRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC: $5k → 13%TRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $5k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $5k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 30 repeat orgs$597k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
21

Total granted

$2.9M
$507k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+42%

Still filing today

27%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationHealthEmploymentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +210%
  • TS
    TRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $27k · revenue +23%
  • LI
    LAKESTATE INDUSTRIES
    4× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • FP
    FIRE & PUBLIC SAFETY DEPTS
    one grant, 2018 · $300k
  • CH
    CHASSELL HISTORICAL ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $55k
  • MT
    MI TECH ENTERPRISE CORP SMARTZONE
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
2
Grand Traverse Pavilions Foundation

Organized to receive and administer funds raised for the purpose of supporting the County owned and operated Grand Traverse Pavilions

Philanthropy
3
Iron Belle Trail Fund

The mission of the Michigan Trails Fund is to secure and distribute private resources that will be used to assist in the expansion and connectivity of the statewide non-motorized trail system which promotes access for all, healthy…

Recreation & Sports
4
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
5
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
6
Lake Superior Community Partnership Inc

To stimulate and sustain a vibrant regional economy by facilitating economic growth and prosperity.

—
7
Tuscola County Community Foundation

To solicit and collect contributions for charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes to benefit the people of and around Tuscola County, Michigan

Philanthropy
8
Huron County Community Foundation

Receive and Administer funds for the public welfare of the people of Huron County, Michigan

Philanthropy
9
Bay Future Inc

Dedicated to facilitating economic development strategies that promote and secure opportunities for business retention, growth, and the attraction of new industries that create quality jobs for community residents.

Community Improvement
10
Superior Snowmobile Club

Maintains snowmobile trails in houghton and ontonagon counties in the upper peninsula of michigan.

—
11
Great Lakes Bay Regional Trail

To support the development and maintenance of non-motorized pathways throughout the great lakes bay region.

Recreation & Sports
12
Duluth Cross Country Ski Club

Promote health through skiing

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Marquette County; the most unlike its peers is Tri-County Safe Harbor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UP STATE FAIR AUTHORITY: $1,020,000 · OtherUP STATE FAIR AUTHORITYCITY OF GLADSTONE: $308,800 · OtherCITY OF GLADSTONEFIRE & PUBLIC SAFETY DEPTS: $300,000 · OtherFIRE & PUBLIC SAFETY DEPTSBAY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $260,200 · OtherBAY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONNORTHERN MI UNIV FOUNDATION: $210,000 · OtherNORTHERN MI UNIV FOUNDATIONTREES FOR TOMORROW: $134,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · Other+45 more: $509,958 · Other+45 moreMichigan Tech Fund: $450,000 · EducationMichigan Tech …+1 more: $10,000 · EducationPREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $43,000 · Human ServicesTRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF DELTA COUNTY: $25,000 · PhilanthropyBARAGA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE COUNTY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMARQUETTE CITY BAND INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureHANCOCK TRAILS CLUB: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsBARRON COUNTY PRO RODEO INC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsLAKESTATE INDUSTRIES: $16,000 · Employment
Other$2,843,458Education$460,000Human Services$70,000Philanthropy$50,000Arts & Culture$45,000Recreation & Sports$27,500Employment$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMichigan Tech Fund: $450,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMARQUETTE CITY BAND INC: $45,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetPREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $43,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC: $27,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DELTA COUNTY: $25,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAKESTATE INDUSTRIES: $16,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTREES FOR TOMORROW INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBARAGA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE COUNTY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAQUAFEST INC: $7,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBARRON COUNTY PRO RODEO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetICE AGE TRAIL ALLIANCE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Michigan Tech Fund ↗
  • Who funds MARQUETTE CITY BAND INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds HANCOCK TRAILS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DELTA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds LAKESTATE INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds TREES FOR TOMORROW INC ↗
  • Who funds BARAGA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AQUAFEST INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Donald and Audrey Anderson FoundationMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Donald and Audrey Anderson Foundation · Edward J Sackerson Charitable Foundation · Robert & Jeanine Dagenais Foundation · Community Foundation of the Upper Peninsula · Superior Health Foundation · The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation · Community Foundation of Marquette County · West End Health Foundation · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Flagstar Foundation Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Melissa Besse Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Melissa Besse Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John and Melissa Besse Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John and Melissa Besse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Melissa Besse’s filings →

    More from the funding graph