Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Mary Franco Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$137kPhilanthropy$63kHuman Services$41kHealth$13kYouth Development$6kPublic Benefit$4kArts & Culture$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$500
Median grant
15
States reached
$996k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$10,000
MAYO FOUNDATION$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$4,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$3,000
INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS$2,000
ST JUDE'S HOSPITAL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$1,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$1,000
TURNING POINT USA$1,000
USO$1,000
VIETNAM VETERAN'S OF AMERICA$500
STATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION$500
LEADERSHIP INST$500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
OH
PA
CA
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$239k · 22 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$239k
$350

Still filing today

59%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +45%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +50%
  • WS
    WALDEN SCHOOL CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • PV
    PROJECT VERITAS
    one grant, 2022 · $250
  • CB
    COROLLA BEACH FIRE AND RESCUE
    one grant, 2020 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Bible Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American International College: $50,000 · EducationAmerican International CollegeHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,500 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 · EducationINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INCWALDEN SCHOOL CORPORATION: $11,000 · EducationWALDEN SCHOOL CORPORATION+2 more: $2,250 · EducationMAYO FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATIONSALVATION ARMY: $24,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYHOLY TRINITY PARISH SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherUSO: $4,000 · Other+12 more: $14,350 · Other+12 moreWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,750 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,750 · HealthMARYHURST INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentLeadership Institute: $2,000 · Public BenefitVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $1,250 · Public BenefitSTATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Education$128,750Other$114,350Human Services$16,000Health$12,500Youth Development$3,500Public Benefit$3,250Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican International College: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWALDEN SCHOOL CORPORATION: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARYHURST INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American International College ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WALDEN SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MARYHURST INC ↗
  • Who funds STATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Mary Franco Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Mary Franco Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • American International College: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Mary Franco Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph