Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Deborah Gillis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$386k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$2.0MHousing & Shelter$100kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$1kHealth$433Community Improvement$125Philanthropy$105Other$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $159k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $227k
$8,474
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$18,598
Individual grant recipient$18,175
Individual grant recipient$16,062
Individual grant recipient$15,966
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$14,853
Individual grant recipient$14,448
Individual grant recipient$13,905
Individual grant recipient$12,740
Individual grant recipient$12,011
Individual grant recipient$11,878
Individual grant recipient$11,000
Individual grant recipient$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,763
Individual grant recipient$10,706
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE DORMITORY: $16k → 10%Tyler Junior College: $31k → 12%SULPHUR BLUFF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $22k → 13%TEXAS A&M-COMMERCE: $112k → 13%PARIS JUNIOR COLLEGE: $21k → 15%North Texas Community College: $12k → 16%TEXAS A&M-COLLEGE STATION: $81k → 22%Okahoma State University: $30k → 19%Ouachita Baptist University: $15k → 20%Legacy On Rio Apartments: $14k → 10%SULPHUR BLUFF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 13%TAMU Commerce: $87k → 13%SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $16k → 14%TEXAS A&M-COLLEGE STATION: $32k → 22%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 19%College of the Ozarks: $13k → 14%MIDTOWN URBAN STUDENT HOUSING: $53k → 11%SULPHUR BLUFF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $18k → 13%TEXAS A&M-COMMERCE: $48k → 13%Texas A&M College Station: $26k → 22%TEXAS A&M-COMMERCE: $43k → 13%TEXAS A&M-COLLEGE STATION: $12k → 22%TEXAS A&M-COMMERCE: $12k → 13%COMO-PICKTON CISD: $31k → 13%COMO-PICKTON CISD: $18k → 13%COMO-PICKTON CISD: $11k → 13%University of Texas at Austin: $12k → 10%NORTH HOPKINS ISD: $26k → 13%NORTH HOPKINS ISD: $23k → 13%JACKSON PETTY: $19k → 13%CABLE GLENN: $18k → 13%KATIE TIFFT: $16k → 13%DANIEL CORRAL: $16k → 13%LUKE RITTER: $15k → 13%ZOE CRUMP: $15k → 13%IAN WESTLUND: $14k → 13%JASMIN WADE: $14k → 13%KEZIAH SIMS: $13k → 13%MICHELLE TIJERIN: $12k → 13%BROOKLYNN SHACKLEFORD: $12k → 13%CHRISTIAN GIBREATH: $11k → 13%CARTER OWEN: $11k → 13%MILLER GROVE ISD: $39k → 13%CUMBY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $29k → 13%CUMBY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 13%CUMBY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15k → 13%Cumby Independent School District: $15k → 13%MILLER GROVE ISD: $11k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
KS
AR
OK
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 33 repeat orgs$718k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 48 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
55

Total granted

$1.4M
$332k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+11%

Still filing today

15%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $386k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Southern Methodist University
    4× · 2021–2024 · $37k · revenue +18%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue +45%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $31k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $87k
  • MU
    MIDTOWN URBAN STUDENT HOUSING
    one grant, 2022 · $53k
  • OS
    Okahoma State University
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
2
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
3
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
4
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
5
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
6
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
7
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
8
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
9
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
10
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
11
Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Mary Hardin-Baylor; the most unlike its peers is Hopkins County Chamber of Commerce Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS A&M-COMMERCE: $215,487 · OtherTEXAS A&M-COMMERCETEXAS A&M-COLLEGE STATION: $155,895 · OtherTEXAS A&M-COLLEGE STATIONTexas Tech University: $110,155 · OtherTexas Tech UniversityIndividual grant recipient: $87,379 · OtherCUMBY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $79,395 · OtherSULPHUR BLUFF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $71,961 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $70,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON: $63,543 · Other+116 more: $1,051,266 · Other+116 moreSouthern Methodist University: $37,379 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $32,074 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $31,313 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $25,501 · EducationOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $11,265 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $6,890 · Education+3 more: $3,372 · EducationGOFUNDMEORG: $105 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $33 · Health
Other$1,905,581Education$162,794Philanthropy$105Health$33

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthern Methodist University: $37,379 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $32,074 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $31,313 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $25,501 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $11,265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $6,890 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParker University: $1,444 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $178 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPKINS COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $33 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Deborah Gillis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Deborah Gillis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Southern Nazarene University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John and Deborah Gillis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John and Deborah Gillis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 136 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Deborah Gillis’ filings →

More from the funding graph