Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$184k
Granted FY2020
24
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$46kHuman Services$33kEducation$28kArts & Culture$22kAnimals$20kYouth Development$19kHousing & Shelter$10kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2020 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k15 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $107k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS ZOO$20,000
MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS$16,666
CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF$10,000
MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS$10,000
GREAT CIRCLE$10,000
BRIDGE BREAD BAKERY$10,000
RANKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$10,000
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
MISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR (FKA US VETS - MISSOURI)$10,000
FOREST PARK FOREVER$8,000
CITY ACADEMY$7,500
MATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$7,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL$6,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$5,000
CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $3k → 21%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $5k → 11%BRIDGE BREAD BAKERY: $10k → 21%ST LOUIS ARC: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Life

To enable individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve the highest level of independent living and live a full and enriched life.

Housing & Shelter
2
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

3
Council Apartments Ii Inc

Provide high quality living and services to enable lower income older adult residents of the managed apartment buildings to flourish independently; and create inspiring programming to enable both residents and community seniors to maintain…

Housing & Shelter
4
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

5
Council Apartments Inc

Provide high quality living and services to enable lower income older adult residents of the managed apartment buildings to flourish independently; and create inspiring programming to enable both residents and community seniors to maintain…

Housing & Shelter
6
St Patrick Partnership Center

To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

7
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
8
Magdala House

To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…

Health
9
Child Center-Marygrove

Providing a safe home, compassionate care and high-quality mental health services to children and youth who have experienced significant trauma, to restore their childhood and equip them to productive adulthood.

Health
10
Clark Community Mental Health Center

Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.

Health
11
Sinnissippi Centers Inc

It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.

Health
12
Horizon Housing Development Company

Help provide housing services to st. louis city residents with developmental and mental disabilities.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Arc Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Michael D and Margaret Ann Latta Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST LOUIS ZOO — $20,000 · OtherST LOUIS ZOOGREAT CIRCLE — $10,000 · OtherGREAT CIRCLEMISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR (FKA US VETS - MISSOURI) — $10,000 · OtherMISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR (FKA US VETS - MISSOUR…MATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB — $7,500 · OtherMATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUBBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL — $6,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COU…CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS (COCA) — $5,000 · OtherCENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS (COCA)UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIACARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $5,000 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS HOSPITALST PATRICK CENTER — $5,000 · OtherST PATRICK CENTERINDEPENDENCE CENTER — $5,000 · OtherINDEPENDENCE CENTER+1 more — $2,000 · OtherCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF — $10,000 · EducationCENTRAL INSTITUTE FO…Ranken Technical College — $10,000 · EducationRanken Technical Col…CITY ACADEMY INC — $7,500 · EducationCITY ACADEMY INCCITY GARDEN MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationCITY GARDEN MONTESSO…Bridge Bread Bakery — $10,000 · Human ServicesBridge Bread …RAINBOW VILLAGE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW VILLA…ST LOUIS ARC INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesST LOUIS ARC …SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE MINI…ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthST LOUIS CHI…MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS — $10,000 · HealthMEMORY CARE …MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $16,666 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL …Forest Park Forever Inc — $8,000 · EnvironmentSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC — $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$80,500Education$32,500Human Services$21,500Health$20,000Arts & Culture$16,666Environment$8,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $16,666 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBridge Bread Bakery — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRanken Technical College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY ACADEMY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY GARDEN MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Pott Foundation · Centene Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · World Wide Technology Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent?

    Find your warmest path to John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $219k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph