Skip to content
John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent at a glance

· Private foundation

John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$184k
Granted FY2020
24
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$46kHuman Services$33kEducation$28kArts & Culture$22kAnimals$20kYouth Development$19kHousing & Shelter$10kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2020 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k15 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $107k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS ZOO$20,000
MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS$16,666
GREAT CIRCLE$10,000
CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF$10,000
MISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR (FKA US VETS - MISSOURI)$10,000
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
RANKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$10,000
MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS$10,000
BRIDGE BREAD BAKERY$10,000
FOREST PARK FOREVER$8,000
CITY ACADEMY$7,500
MATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$7,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL$6,000
INDEPENDENCE CENTER$5,000
SHERWOOD FOREST$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $3k → 21%RAINBOW VILLAGE: $5k → 11%BRIDGE BREAD BAKERY: $10k → 21%ST LOUIS ARC: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Life

To enable individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve the highest level of independent living and live a full and enriched life.

Housing & Shelter
2
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

—
3
Council Apartments Ii Inc

Provide high quality living and services to enable lower income older adult residents of the managed apartment buildings to flourish independently; and create inspiring programming to enable both residents and community seniors to maintain…

Housing & Shelter
4
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
5
Council Apartments Inc

Provide high quality living and services to enable lower income older adult residents of the managed apartment buildings to flourish independently; and create inspiring programming to enable both residents and community seniors to maintain…

Housing & Shelter
6
St Patrick Partnership Center

To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

—
7
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
8
Magdala House

To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…

Health
9
Child Center-Marygrove

Providing a safe home, compassionate care and high-quality mental health services to children and youth who have experienced significant trauma, to restore their childhood and equip them to productive adulthood.

Health
10
Clark Community Mental Health Center

Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.

Health
11
Sinnissippi Centers Inc

It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.

Health
12
Horizon Housing Development Company

Help provide housing services to st. louis city residents with developmental and mental disabilities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Arc Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Michael D and Margaret Ann Latta Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LOUIS ZOO: $20,000 · OtherST LOUIS ZOOGREAT CIRCLE: $10,000 · OtherGREAT CIRCLEMISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR (FKA US VETS - MISSOURI): $10,000 · OtherMISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR (FKA US VETS - MISSOUR…MATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB: $7,500 · OtherMATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUBBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL: $6,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COU…CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5,000 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS HOSPITALINDEPENDENCE CENTER: $5,000 · OtherINDEPENDENCE CENTERST PATRICK CENTER: $5,000 · OtherST PATRICK CENTERUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIACENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS (COCA): $5,000 · OtherCENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS (COCA)+1 more: $2,000 · OtherRanken Technical College: $10,000 · EducationRanken Technical Col…CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $10,000 · EducationCENTRAL INSTITUTE FO…CITY ACADEMY INC: $7,500 · EducationCITY ACADEMY INCCITY GARDEN MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationCITY GARDEN MONTESSO…Bridge Bread Bakery: $10,000 · Human ServicesBridge Bread …RAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW VILLA…ST LOUIS ARC INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesST LOUIS ARC …SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE MINI…ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthST LOUIS CHI…MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $10,000 · HealthMEMORY CARE …MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $16,666 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL …Forest Park Forever Inc: $8,000 · EnvironmentSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$80,500Education$32,500Human Services$21,500Health$20,000Arts & Culture$16,666Environment$8,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $16,666 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRanken Technical College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBridge Bread Bakery: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITY ACADEMY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDEPENDENCE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY GARDEN MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…Jordan Mary R & Ettie…Pott FoundationCentene FoundationUnited Way of Greater…St Louis Community Fo…Pershing Charitable T…Sam and Marilyn Fox F…St Louis Philanthropi…World Wide Technology…Edward Jones Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …
St Louis Community Foundation IncMO25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Pott Foundation · Centene Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · World Wide Technology Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent?

    Find your warmest path to John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $219k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Brad Landsbaum Registered Agent’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home