Skip to content

· Private foundation

John A & Gretchen Dinsdale Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$300kHuman Services$241kCommunity Improvement$236kEmployment$176kArts & Culture$155kHealth$140kMembership Benefit$120kHousing & Shelter$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $121k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $106k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Merrick Foundation Inc$56,000
Hastings College Foundation$50,000
Palmer Community Foundation-Day Care$31,000
Stuhr Museum Foundation$25,000
Angels Among Us$20,000
The Palmer American Legion$15,000
Goodwill Foundation of Greater Nebraska Inc$10,000
Good Life Rescue$10,000
GICC Development Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOPE HARBOR: $20k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $10k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $10k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $10k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $10k → 12%Hope Harbor: $5k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $5k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 21 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+89%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue ×31 · 65% of their budget
  • SM
    STUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $155k · revenue +27%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $80k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +89%
  • HC
    HALL COUNTY HERO FLIGHT
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UC
    UNITED CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Doberman Rescue of Nebraska Inc

Rescue dobermans from shelters, owners who cannot or will not provide for them, and those who are strays whose owners never try to locate them.

Animals
2
Goodwill Industries Foundation of Greater Nebraska Inc

To raise the funds necessary to support the services provided by goodwill industries of greater nebraska, inc.

—
3
Nebraska Game and Parks Foundation

The organization is focused on the future of parks, wildlife management and conservation of nebraska.

Environment
4
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
5
Nebraska Humane Society

The nebraska humane society protects, saves and enriches the lives of animals in the communities we serve. we do this by providing a broad spectrum of services for the greater omaha area. program offerings include adoption, animal foster…

Animals
6
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
7
Humane Society of Taos Inc dba Stray Hearts Animal Shelter

Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…

Animals
8
Omaha Parks Foundation

The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…

Environment
9
Amazing Grace Pet Rescue

Amazing grace aims save the lives of pet's throughout southeastern new mexico through rescue services, veterinary care and adoption efforts.

Animals
10
Lincoln Animal Ambassadors

To address the root causes of animal homelessness in lincoln, nebraska and surrounding communites.

Animals
11
Hastings Community Foundation Inc

The hastings community foundation works to perpetuate and enrich the quality of life in hastings and the surrounding area through the prudent investment and management of philanthropic donations.

Philanthropy
12
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Nebraska Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hastings College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOODWILL FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEBRASKA: $164,000 · OtherGOODWILL FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEBRASKASTUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $155,000 · OtherSTUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $154,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (PARK FUND): $151,000 · OtherGI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (PARK FUND)Palmer Community Foundation-Day Care: $136,000 · OtherPalmer Community Foundation-Day CareSALVATION ARMY: $90,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYROSE HILL CEMETERY: $90,000 · OtherROSE HILL CEMETERYGICC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $85,000 · OtherGICC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONPalmer Community FoundationSchool Endowment Fund: $70,000 · OtherPalmer Community FoundationSchool Endowment FundMERRICK FOUNDATION INC: $56,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $45,000 · Other+5 more: $60,000 · OtherHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $230,000 · EducationHASTINGS COLLE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 · HealthANGELS AMONG US: $40,000 · HealthThe Tabitha Foundation Inc: $20,000 · HealthHOPE HARBOR INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 · AnimalsSTART OVER ROVER: $15,000 · AnimalsTHE GOOD LIFE RESCUE: $10,000 · AnimalsSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC: $12,175 · Employment
Other$1,256,000Education$230,000Health$140,000Human Services$75,000Animals$45,000Recreation & Sports$40,000Employment$12,175

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $230,000 over 9y, 65% of budgetSTUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HARBOR INC: $75,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetANGELS AMONG US: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Tabitha Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSTART OVER ROVER: $15,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC: $12,175 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds MERRICK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS AMONG US ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Tabitha Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds START OVER ROVER ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD LIFE RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ethel S Abbott Charitable FoundationNE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ethel S Abbott Charitable Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Edgar & Frances Reynolds Foundation Inc · Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati · Greater Grand Island Community Foundation · Hirschfeld Family Foundation Inc · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John A & Gretchen Dinsdale Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John A & Gretchen Dinsdale Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John A & Gretchen Dinsdale Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John A & Gretchen Dinsdale Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John A & Gretchen Dinsdale’s filings →

    More from the funding graph