Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John A & Gretchen Dinsdale Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$300kHuman Services$241kCommunity Improvement$236kEmployment$176kArts & Culture$155kHealth$140kMembership Benefit$120kHousing & Shelter$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $121k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $106k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Merrick Foundation Inc$56,000
Hastings College Foundation$50,000
Palmer Community Foundation-Day Care$31,000
Stuhr Museum Foundation$25,000
Angels Among Us$20,000
The Palmer American Legion$15,000
Goodwill Foundation of Greater Nebraska Inc$10,000
GICC Development Foundation$10,000
Good Life Rescue$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOPE HARBOR: $20k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $10k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $10k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $10k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $10k → 12%Hope Harbor: $5k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $5k → 12%HOPE HARBOR: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 21 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+89%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue ×31 · 65% of their budget
  • SM
    STUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $155k · revenue +27%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $80k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +89%
  • HC
    HALL COUNTY HERO FLIGHT
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UC
    UNITED CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Doberman Rescue of Nebraska Inc

Rescue dobermans from shelters, owners who cannot or will not provide for them, and those who are strays whose owners never try to locate them.

Animals
2
Goodwill Industries Foundation of Greater Nebraska Inc

To raise the funds necessary to support the services provided by goodwill industries of greater nebraska, inc.

3
Nebraska Game and Parks Foundation

The organization is focused on the future of parks, wildlife management and conservation of nebraska.

Environment
4
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
5
Nebraska Humane Society

The nebraska humane society protects, saves and enriches the lives of animals in the communities we serve. we do this by providing a broad spectrum of services for the greater omaha area. program offerings include adoption, animal foster…

Animals
6
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
7
Humane Society of Taos Inc dba Stray Hearts Animal Shelter

Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…

Animals
8
Omaha Parks Foundation

The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…

Environment
9
Amazing Grace Pet Rescue

Amazing grace aims save the lives of pet's throughout southeastern new mexico through rescue services, veterinary care and adoption efforts.

Animals
10
Lincoln Animal Ambassadors

To address the root causes of animal homelessness in lincoln, nebraska and surrounding communites.

Animals
11
Hastings Community Foundation Inc

The hastings community foundation works to perpetuate and enrich the quality of life in hastings and the surrounding area through the prudent investment and management of philanthropic donations.

Philanthropy
12
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Nebraska Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hastings College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOODWILL FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEBRASKA — $164,000 · OtherGOODWILL FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEBRASKASTUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $155,000 · OtherSTUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $154,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (PARK FUND) — $151,000 · OtherGI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (PARK FUND)Palmer Community Foundation-Day Care — $136,000 · OtherPalmer Community Foundation-Day CareSALVATION ARMY — $90,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYROSE HILL CEMETERY — $90,000 · OtherROSE HILL CEMETERYGICC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $85,000 · OtherGICC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONPalmer Community FoundationSchool Endowment Fund — $70,000 · OtherPalmer Community FoundationSchool Endowment FundMERRICK FOUNDATION INC — $56,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN RED CROSS — $45,000 · Other+5 more — $60,000 · OtherHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $230,000 · EducationHASTINGS COLLE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $80,000 · HealthANGELS AMONG US — $40,000 · HealthThe Tabitha Foundation Inc — $20,000 · HealthHOPE HARBOR INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $20,000 · AnimalsSTART OVER ROVER — $15,000 · AnimalsTHE GOOD LIFE RESCUE — $10,000 · AnimalsSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC — $12,175 · Employment
Other$1,256,000Education$230,000Health$140,000Human Services$75,000Animals$45,000Recreation & Sports$40,000Employment$12,175

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $230,000 over 9y, 65% of budgetSTUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $155,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HARBOR INC — $75,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetANGELS AMONG US — $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Tabitha Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSTART OVER ROVER — $15,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC — $12,175 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds HOPE HARBOR INC
  • Who funds MERRICK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ANGELS AMONG US
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC
  • Who funds The Tabitha Foundation Inc
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds START OVER ROVER
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC
  • Who funds THE GOOD LIFE RESCUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ethel S Abbott Charitable FoundationNE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ethel S Abbott Charitable Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Edgar & Frances Reynolds Foundation Inc · Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati · Greater Grand Island Community Foundation · Hirschfeld Family Foundation Inc · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John A & Gretchen Dinsdale Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John A & Gretchen Dinsdale Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John A & Gretchen Dinsdale Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph