· Private foundation
Johansen T H Family Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATL CONGREGATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHURCHES | $8,000 |
| PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC | $2,500 |
| OASIS HEALTH NETWORK INC | $2,000 |
| UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $1,500 |
| HEART STRINGS FOR HORSES | $1,500 |
| PEAK 7 ADVENTURES | $1,500 |
| WE HEART SEATTLE | $1,500 |
| BLESSED SACRAMENT SCHOOL | $1,500 |
| TEDFORD HOUSING | $1,500 |
| SARVEY WILDLIFE CARE CENTER | $1,500 |
| LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER | $1,500 |
| SERVICE PEACE WARRIORS | $1,500 |
| RAVEN ROCK RANCH | $1,500 |
| CARING FOR CATS | $1,500 |
| MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUND I | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY7× · 2018–2024 · $51k · revenue +31%
- THTEDFORD HOUSING8× · 2018–2025 · $21k · revenue +276%
- FMFriendsview Manor7× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- NANATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONGRETIONALone grant, 2022 · $3k
- MAMILLER ART CENTER FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -93%
- MSMORGAN SCOTT PROJECT FOR COOPERATIVE CHRISTIANone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To create decent, affordable housing for those in need, and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.
Habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope. through advocacy, collaboration, and leadership, hfh-mn advances the work of minnesota's habitat for humanity affiliates to create and preserve affordable…
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
Habitat for humanity of washington dodge counties, wisconsin, inc. is a locally-run affiliate of habitat for humanity international, a nonprofit ecumenical christian housing ministry. habitat for humanity works in partnership with people…
Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…
To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
Habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an affiliate of the americus-based habitat for humanity international. habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to…
To build partnerships among volunteers, families, and the community in order to build simple, decent houses for families in need.
To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Forward Collective Inc and the most unlike its peers is Raven Rock Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TEDFORD HOUSING ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE NEWBERG HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friendsview Manor ↗
- Who funds Newberg Early Birds Rotary Foundation ↗
- Who funds OASIS HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ODD FELLOWS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MASONIC-EASTERN STAR HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Community Services Northwest ↗
- Who funds DOOR COMMUNITY AUDITORIUM CORP ↗
- Who funds DOOR COUNTY MARITIME MUSEUM & LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds PINK UMBRELLA THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds LOVE WORTH SHARING EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Harpswell Heritage Land Trust ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds DOOR COUNTY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds YAMHILL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds DR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds NEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · The Alfred M Senter Fund Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Door County Community Foundation Inc · Mmg Foundation Inc · Ellsworth and Carla Peterson Charitable Foundation · Direct Supply Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Johansen T H Family Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community and Shelter Assistance Corp — 5% of income from government
- George Fox University — 2% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.