Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Joe Ricketts Nebraska Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$920k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$535k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Social Science$777kEducation$550kPublic Benefit$204kCommunity Improvement$125kFood & Nutrition$102kArts & Culture$70kEnvironment$62kInternational$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
  • $250k+1 grant · $535k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Wyoming Foundation$535,000
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research$200,000
Manhattan Institute for Public Policy Research$75,000
Hudson Institute Inc$50,000
Sublette County Historical Society dba Museum of the Mountain Man$20,000
Home Schooling for College Credit Inc$15,000
The Federalist Society$10,000
Church of Our Lady of Peace$6,000
Fur Trade Days Inc dba Museum of the Fur Trade$2,000
Judicial Watch Inc$1,000
Papillion Community Foundation$1,000
National Museum of Wildlife Art$1,000
Pinedale Fine Arts Council$1,000
Wyoming Stock Growers Endowment Trust$1,000
Institute for Justice$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%The Afya Foundation of America: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
NY
WY
CO
NE
VA
TN
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$833k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$1.2M
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $556k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePublic BenefitSocial ScienceCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue +26%
  • WS
    WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST
    3× · 2022–2024 · $102k · revenue +34%
  • HI
    Hudson Institute Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $52k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • MI
    Mahattan Institute
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
  • GY
    GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION
    one grant, 2023 · $62k · revenue -47%
  • TA
    THE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Wyofile

Wyofile is an independent, nonprofit news service focused on the people, places and policy of wyoming. recognizing the rapid decline in resources among traditional news outlets, wyofile offers in-depth coverage of complicated subjects and…

Arts & Culture
4
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
9
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
10
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
11
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $600,000 · Social ScienceAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR…UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $535,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATI…Mahattan Institute — $125,000 · OtherMahattan InstituteWYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST — $102,000 · OtherWYOMING STOCK GROWERS EN…Hudson Institute Inc — $51,500 · OtherHudson Institute IncSUBLETTE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM OF THE MOUNTAIN MAN — $50,000 · OtherSUBLETTE COUNTY HISTORIC…THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES — $20,000 · OtherHOMESCHOOLING FOR COLLEGE CREDIT INC — $15,000 · Other+19 more — $79,950 · Other+19 moreMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC — $200,000 · Public BenefitMANHATTAN I…+1 more — $4,000 · Public BenefitWOODSON CENTER — $125,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION — $62,250 · EnvironmentTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $50,000 · Human Services
Social Science$600,000Education$535,000Other$443,450Public Benefit$204,000Community Improvement$125,000Environment$62,250Human Services$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $600,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $535,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC — $200,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWOODSON CENTER — $125,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST — $102,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION — $62,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHudson Institute Inc — $51,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSUBLETTE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM OF THE MOUNTAIN MAN — $50,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORD MEDIATION CENTER — $7,900 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBuffalo Bill Memorial Association — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINEDALE FINE ARTS COUNCIL INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER EUROPE MISSION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAPILLION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION — $650 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Joe Ricketts Nebraska Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joe Ricketts Nebraska Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Joe Ricketts Nebraska Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph