· Private foundation
Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k48 grants · $139k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH | $33,333 |
| PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $21,500 |
| ASANTE FOUNDATION | $21,500 |
| ST MARY'S ENDOWMENT FUND | $20,000 |
| HOLLY THEATRE RESTORATION PROJECT | $13,531 |
| SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| LA CLINICA DEL VALLE | $7,500 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $7,500 |
| ST MARY'S OF MEDFORD INC | $7,500 |
| HOPE EQUESTRIAN CENTER | $7,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY | $7,000 |
| CRATERIAN GINGER ROGERS THEATER | $5,000 |
| AMAHORO CHILDREN & COMMUNITY TEAM | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
64 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SMST MARY'S OF MEDFORD INC8× · 2017–2024 · $183k · revenue +33%
- UWUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +96%
- HEHOPE EQUESTRIAN CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2020 · $5k
- AACCESSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +159%
- SMST MARY'S SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to grow organizing power and leaders for a more just and thriving Southern Oregon.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.
To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.
To conserve and enhance land in southern oregon to sustain our human and natural communities forever.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Engage with diverse constituencies on forest health and wild fire risk projects to support resilient landscapes, thriving communities, wood manufacturing and workforce development
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Opportunities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Schola Cantus Angelorum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST MARY'S OF MEDFORD INC ↗
- Who funds ASANTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds KIDS UNLIMITED OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CRATER LAKE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S ENDOWMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Amahoro Children & Community Team ↗
- Who funds JACKSON COUNTY SART ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON FRIENDS OF HOSPICE ↗
- Who funds ROGUE RETREAT ↗
- Who funds CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SISKIYOU MUSIC PROJECT ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SYMPHONY OF SOUTHERN OREGON ↗
- Who funds SISKIYOU VIOLINS ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds TALENT MAKER CITY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ROGUE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds OREGON FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MASLOW PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ADDICTIONS RECOVERY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Carpenter Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Careoregon Inc · United Way of Jackson County Inc · The Roundhouse Foundation · West Family Foundation · Robert and Frances Chaney Family Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Anna May Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Living Opportunities Inc — 90% of income from government
- Access — 65% of income from government
- Community Works Inc — 59% of income from government
- Rogue Food Unites — 48% of income from government
- Reclaiming Lives — 47% of income from government
- Oregon Center for Creative Learning Dba Kid Time — 42% of income from government
- Youth Era — 39% of income from government
- The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery — 38% of income from government
- Maslow Project — 22% of income from government
- Jackson County Sart — 14% of income from government
- Rogue Retreat — 12% of income from government
- United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
- Addictions Recovery Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Compass House Inc — 7% of income from government
- Youth Symphony of Southern Oregon — 6% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Historical Society Inc — 4% of income from government
- Hope Equestrian Center — 3% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca — 1% of income from government
- Bandon Community Youth Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Casa of Jackson County Inc — 0% of income from government
- Southern Oregon University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Friends of Hospice — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.