· Private foundation
Joe and Mary Moeller Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $121k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $220k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST CATHERINE OF SIENA CATHOLIC CHURCH | $145,000 |
| MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER | $75,000 |
| WICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF WICHITA | $15,000 |
| PRIEST'S RETIREMENT AND EDUCATION FUND | $11,000 |
| THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER HOUSTON | $10,000 |
| KETCH | $10,000 |
| ST JOHN PAUL II INDEPENDENT SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| RESTORATION CHURCH | $10,000 |
| KANSAS HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HEADSTRONG PROJECT INC | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN FIRST CEO KANSAS INC | $5,000 |
| MOUNT OLIVET LUTHERAN CHURCH | $5,000 |
| CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WICHITA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +95%
- BOBIG OAK RANCH INC5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +57%
- KEKANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- STST THOMAS AQUINASone grant, 2022 · $15k
- TWTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOMEone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -6%
- CACHARITY AND DEVELOPMENT APPEALone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.
To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEAD STRONG PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds Midwest Battle Buddies Inc ↗
- Who funds KANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN FIRST CEO KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds Houston Golf Association Youth Program Inc dba First Tee of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN PAUL II INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Sigma Chi Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Kansas Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
- Who funds SOFIA'S HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Walser Foundation · Russ & Helen Meyer Charitable Trust · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · Wichita Foundation · Ima Foundation · Tim and Tracy Farrell Foundation · Lair Foundation · DeVore Foundation Inc · Laham Family Foundation · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Joe and Mary Moeller Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.