Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joe and Jennifer Potts Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$259k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$109kEducation$22kHuman Services$16kEnvironment$3kFood & Nutrition$3kCrime & Legal$2kAnimals$2kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $9k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLLAND HALL$250,000
HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF TULSA$5,000
GLOBAL GARDENS TULSA$1,500
CALM CENTER$1,000
STREET SCHOOL$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$500
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF TULSA: $10k → 15%HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF TULSA: $5k → 15%HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF TULSA: $5k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTIONS SERVICES: $1k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTIONS SERVICES: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$396k · 11 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$396k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+20%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $88k · revenue +109%
  • TULSA OPERA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +249%
  • STREET SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • MC
    MARQUETE CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • UW
    UP WITH TREES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • MC
    MARQUETTE CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
2
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
3
Oklahoma Hospital Association Inc

The mission of the Oklahoma Hospital Association is to promote the welfare of the public by representing its members and advocating on their behalf, providing services to assist its members in meeting the health care needs of their…

—
4
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
5
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
6
Osteopathic Founders Foundation

The mission of the osteopathic founders foundation is to support osteopathic medical education, to enhance the public's understanding of osteopathic medicine, and to improve the health of the community through projects consistent with the…

Health
7
Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma

The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)

Health
8
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
9
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
10
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

—
11
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
12
Tulsa Volunteers of America Senior Housing Inc

Provides housing to elderly persons under section 202 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLLAND HALL: $266,250 · OtherHOLLAND HALLMARQUETE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10,175 · Other+14 more: $23,350 · Other+14 moreTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $88,350 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF A…TULSA OPERA INC: $4,500 · Arts & CulturePHILOS HOSPITALITY INC: $20,341 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $2,000 · Human ServicesSTREET SCHOOL INC: $2,900 · EducationPokes With A Purpose Inc: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250 · HealthSt John Health System Inc: $200 · Health
Other$299,775Arts & Culture$92,850Human Services$22,341Education$2,900Recreation & Sports$1,000Health$950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $88,350 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPHILOS HOSPITALITY INC: $20,341 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTULSA OPERA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUP WITH TREES INC: $3,122 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC: $2,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPokes With A Purpose Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt John Health System Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeighborhood Funders Group: $155 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILOS HOSPITALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds UP WITH TREES INC ↗
  • Who funds STREET SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Pokes With A Purpose Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds St John Health System Inc ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Funders Group ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hardesty Family Foundation IncOK19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Gelvin Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Ruth Nelson Family Foundation · Zink Family Foundation · The Oxley Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joe and Jennifer Potts Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joe and Jennifer Potts Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Up With Trees Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joe and Jennifer Potts Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joe and Jennifer Potts Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joe and Jennifer Potts Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph