Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ruth Nelson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.6M
Granted FY2023
79
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of Ruth Nelson Family Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 79 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 79 grants below total $3,053,550 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,643,350 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $589,800 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k28 grants · $119k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $633k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+1 grant · $700k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$96M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Charities$700,000
Clarehouse$231,000
Emergency Infant Service$160,000
Day Center for the Homeless$155,000
Helping Hands Ministry$120,000
Planned Parenthood Great Plains$100,000
Crosstown Learning Center$85,000
South Peoria Neighborhood Connect Fnd$75,000
Jewish Federation of Tulsa$71,000
Mental Health Association$70,000
Eastern Oklahoma Donated Dental$60,000
Tulsa Center for the Physically Limited$60,000
Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma$60,000
Life Senior Services of Tulsa$55,000
Community Service Council of Tulsa$50,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 8 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 68 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$1.9M
$10k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Clarehouse Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $256k · revenue +16%
  • CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $110k · revenue +5%
  • LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CF
    Community Food Bank
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • BS
    Boy Scouts of America
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
2
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
3
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

4
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

5
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
6
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
7
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
9
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
10
Tulsa School of Arts and Sciences

The mission of tsas middle and high school is to provide students a multi-strand liberal arts education in a safe, supportive, individualized and challenging school environment through a college preparatory curriculum.

Education
11
Ywca Tulsa Inc

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
12
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support CentersJewish Community FederationsCharter and Independent Sch…Addiction & Mental Health T…Food Pantries and AssistanceUrban Agriculture EducationLocal History MuseumsDomestic Violence and Sexua…Indigenous Community Develo…Developmental Disabilities …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Hospital SystemsClassical Music OrchestrasChristian Outreach Ministri…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Childhood Cancer SupportEducation Equity InitiativesEnvironmental Advocacy and …Hospice and Palliative Care
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr17%10%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr19%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr17%5%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr14%18%35–55yr19%46%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/51
the rest of the field
13%
2,509/19,371

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/49
Grantees still filing
24/49
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Life Senior Services of Tulsa — $1,165,000 · OtherLife Senior Services of TulsaCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $700,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INCDay Center for the Homeless — $175,000 · OtherDay Center for the HomelessEmergency Infant Service — $160,000 · Other+44 more — $805,250 · Other+44 moreClarehouse Inc — $256,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse IncBOSTON AVENUE HELPING HANDS INC — $120,000 · Human ServicesBOSTON AVENUE HE…CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC — $110,000 · Human ServicesCROSSTOWN LEARNI…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $40,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENC…TULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesOklahoma Caring Foundation Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC — $25,000 · Human Services+3 more — $24,700 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS — $120,000 · HealthMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $70,000 · HealthINDIAN HEALTH CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC — $35,000 · HealthHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES — $20,000 · Health+2 more — $8,000 · HealthDREXEL ACADEMY INC — $50,000 · EducationKIPP TULSA ACADEMY COLLEGE PREP INC — $25,000 · EducationTulsa Community College Foundation — $20,000 · EducationSTREET SCHOOL INC — $15,000 · EducationSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA OPERA INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE TULSA INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE — $5,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $2,100 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $60,000 · Food & NutritionThe Food Project Inc — $50,000 · Food & NutritionJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA — $71,000 · PhilanthropyBOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,005,250Human Services$630,700Health$253,000Education$115,000Arts & Culture$112,100Food & Nutrition$110,000Philanthropy$79,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $700,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetClarehouse Inc — $256,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS — $120,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOSTON AVENUE HELPING HANDS INC — $120,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetCROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC — $110,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA — $71,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $70,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Food Project Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDREXEL ACADEMY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIAN HEALTH CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOklahoma Caring Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetJOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetKIPP TULSA ACADEMY COLLEGE PREP INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA OPERA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHEATRE TULSA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGlobal Gardens Incorporated — $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLiving Arts of Tulsa Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTSHA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEXPANDED SCHOOLS INC — $4,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALMER CONTINUUM OF CARE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Coalition of 100 Black Men Association — $2,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK74.6× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Gelvin Foundation · Hille Family Charitable Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ruth Nelson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ruth Nelson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $5.5M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph