Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Joe and Chris Aloe Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$37kHealth$11kReligion$4kInternational$2kHuman Services$2kYouth Development$2kRecreation & Sports$2kArts & Culture$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,050
Individual grant recipient$2,000
QUARRY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY GUIDANCE: $500 → 9%THE BLESSING BOARD: $200 → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$41k · 4 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +105% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
21

Total granted

$41k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+34%

Still filing today

75%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalPublic BenefitHealthPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    TIMOTHY E NETTLES MEMORIAL FUND
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +244%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k
  • SH
    SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES
    2× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • PB
    PENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • PC
    PITTSBURGH CURE SARCOMAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +97%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth With a Mission Pittsburgh Inc

To know god, and make him known

Religion
2
But God Ministries

Sharing the love of jesus christ by building sustainable communities around the world and providing medical care to low-income households in the united states. the organization is currently building two sustainable communities in haiti and…

International
3
Mission Quest

Mission quest exists to glorify god by assisting christian missionaries and to reach the nations with the message of faith, grace, and victory through jesus christ. this is accomplished through mobilizing and support of missionaries and…

Youth Development
4
Sarcoma Strong Inc

To support our sarcoma families at every step of their journey with sarcoma

Health
5
Third World Missions Inc

Youth missions training and evangelism, equipping youth and adults to spread the gospel of jesus christ in third world countries.

Religion
6
Horizonte Ministries

For the promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ and to invest in the planting of churches.

Religion
7
Kingdom Missions Fund

To fund christian missions projects worldwide.

Religion
8
Siouxland Youth for Christ

To provide youth ministry services to youth in the siouxland area.

Youth Development
9
Pathway Ministries

Minister to the spiritual and welfare needs of individuals and families

Human Services
10
Joshua Nations International

Spreading christianity worldwide.

Religion
11
Jim King Ministries Inc

Proclaim the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
12
Philadelphia Gospel Movement

Philadelphia gospel movement connects and equips christian leaders to help transform our neighborhoods and city.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Guidance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Quaker Valley Hockey Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TIMOTHY E NETTLES MEMORIAL FUND — $30,000 · Public BenefitTIMOTHY E NETTLES MEMORIAL FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $5,550 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $3,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientQUARRY SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $2,000 · OtherQUARRY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWPGA SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $2,000 · OtherWPGA SCHOLARSHIP FUNDWEST END HOUSE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $1,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLAR FOUNDATION — $1,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,000 · OtherPALMS GOLF CLUB - COVID BENEFIT — $1,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · OtherSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $1,000 · OtherDESERT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Other+5 more — $2,250 · Other+5 morePENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION — $5,000 · PhilanthropySOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES — $3,500 · ReligionYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $2,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY GUIDANCE INC — $500 · Human ServicesTHE BLESSING BOARD — $200 · Human ServicesYAHVE-JIRE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION-US — $2,400 · InternationalMEETING GOD IN MISSIONS — $250 · InternationalPITTSBURGH CURE SARCOMA — $2,000 · Health
Public Benefit$30,000Other$25,050Philanthropy$5,000Religion$3,500Human Services$2,700International$2,650Health$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIMOTHY E NETTLES MEMORIAL FUND — $30,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYAHVE-JIRE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION-US — $2,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH CURE SARCOMA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEETING GOD IN MISSIONS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLESSING BOARD — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William & Frances Aloe Charitable FoundationPA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William & Frances Aloe Charitable Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Eqt Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Joe and Chris Aloe Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joe and Chris Aloe Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Joe and Chris Aloe Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph