· Private foundation
Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltd
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k35 grants · $105k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $227k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $507k
- $250k+1 grant · $672k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR ADOPTION SUPPORT AND EDUCATION | $672,390 |
| CREATING A FAMILY INC | $226,000 |
| Selfless Love Foundation | $160,000 |
| Safe Families for Children | $65,000 |
| Alliance Family Services | $56,000 |
| Styles 4 Kidz | $41,400 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF LA CROSSE | $36,750 |
| Alliance Family Services | $30,000 |
| Replanted Ministry | $25,000 |
| A21 USA Inc | $25,000 |
| Backyard Orphans | $25,000 |
| Champion Forward | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,625 |
| Mary Hurst Inc | $3,000 |
| Gainesville First United Methodist Church | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltd’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 10% of the giving stays in WI; read by stated purpose it is 26% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR ADOPTION SUPPORT AND EDUCATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +60%
- CACREATING A FAMILY6× · 2020–2025 · $887k · revenue +105% · 28% of their budget
- AFALLIANCE FAMILY SERVICES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $292k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- SISleep in Heavenly Peace - Nationalone grant, 2024 · $100k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $18k
- FTFOR THE CHILDRENone grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Foster Kinship supports all kinship families throughout Nevada. We assist grandparents, relatives, and fictive kin who are raising children through five core programs: 1- Enhanced Kinship Navigator Program - Provides intensive support to…
The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…
helping kids find their parents or legal custodians
To provide a safe, healthy, informed and supportive environment where all people can grow and thrive
Fostering family dba the riverside project is a 501(c)(3) public charity that on behalf of houston's children and their families, brings together organizations and passionate people working as one to help families heal and children thrive.
Our Mission is to take the lead in protecting children entrusted to our care or protection from further abuse and neglect by carefully selecting the most qualified and dedicated foster parents available to operate foster homes for the…
Carolina adoption services provides international and domestic adoption services, foster care, home studies, and post adoption support for children, youth and adoptive families.
Support for foster children and parents
Families thrive, inc. is dedicated to finding loving adoptive families for children waiting in foster care. roughly half a million children in the u.s. have been removed from unsafe homes, and of these, 120,000 are free for adoption. the…
Children's choice is a christian social service agency, which provides specialized community-based services. children's choice serves as a bridge for individuals who are in need of the re-integrative process of family living. intensive,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ennis Center for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys 2 Men Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER FOR ADOPTION SUPPORT AND EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds CREATING A FAMILY ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Diocese ↗
- Who funds Replanted Ministry ↗
- Who funds A21 USA INC ↗
- Who funds Champion Forward ↗
- Who funds BACKYARD ORPHANS ↗
- Who funds WE ARE CALLED TO CARE NFP ↗
- Who funds Congregations for Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds ADOPTION RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds Clara's Hope ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds The Isaiah 117 Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Transformations By Atlanta Angels ↗
- Who funds FOR THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SEVEN HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds MARYHURST INC ↗
- Who funds Miriams Heart Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOOM OUR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds City Takers Inc ↗
- Who funds ENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S ↗
- Who funds HILL & HIGH WATER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ticket to Dream Foundation · Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Good360 · Servant Foundation · The Gap Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Adoption Support and Education Inc — 51% of income from government
- Haven Retreats Inc — 0% of income from government
- Miriams Heart Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltd?
Find your warmest path to Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.