Skip to content
Jobs for the Future Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Jobs for the Future Inc

Jff is building a future that works - for everyone.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
113
Grants FY2024still arriving
35
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$32MEducation$25MCommunity Improvement$4.7MSocial Science$2.0MPhilanthropy$1.6MYouth Development$1.2MHealth$968kPublic Benefit$925kOther$0
02FY2024 · 113 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k48 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k49 grants · $5.5M
  • $250k+11 grants · $5.5M
$60,000
Median grant
35
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURNING GLASS INSTITUTE$1,050,450
EDX BOOT CAMPS LLC$948,298
EDX LLC$800,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$697,403
THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS LTD$400,000
THE EMPOWERMENT CENTER$350,000
CHICAGO WOMEN IN TRADES$275,217
JEVS HUMAN SERVICES$255,232
INTELLIGENT PARTNERSHIPS INC$255,125
HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY TRAINING AND EDUCATION FUND DBA HOSPITALITY TRAINING$250,000
JFF LABS INC$250,000
FSG INC$247,500
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DBA OFFICE OF ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE DEV$227,730
PARTNERSHIP FOR A BETTER SAN DIEGO$200,000
EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUJOURNERS CARE NETWORK: $5k → 21%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $200k → 14%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $60k → 19%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $30k → 19%COFEM: $120k → 14%THRIVE CHICAGO: $30k → 11%WASHINGTON ACADEMY FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES: $105k → 9%WASHINGTON ACADEMY FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES: $30k → 9%DALLAS COUNTY LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD DBA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS GRE: $173k → 14%DALLAS COUNTY LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD DBA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS GRE: $155k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS GREATER DALLAS: $75k → 14%DALLAS COUNTY LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD: $50k → 14%INNER CITY STRUGGLE: $120k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Jobs for the Future Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Jobs for the Future Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57M · 189 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

189 repeat relationships: 71 still active in FY2024, 118 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

189
198

Total granted

$57M
$9.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+22%

Still filing today

61%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PER SCHOLAS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.7M · revenue +480%
  • BG
    BURNING GLASS INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +31%
  • WR
    WISCONSIN REGIONAL TRAINING PARTNERSHIP
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • TB
    TURNING BASIN LABS CO-OP INC
    one grant, 2023 · $610k
  • AF
    Audacious Futures Corporation
    one grant, 2019 · $506k
  • PL
    PANOWATCH LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $318k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Council for Workforce Education

NCWE promotes student success and excellence in education and training by providing the link between policy and practice.

Education
2
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
3
Massachusetts Regional Employment Board Association

The massachusetts workforce association (mwa) is a statewide membership association that leads, advocates and convenes on behalf of the massachusetts workforce development system.

Employment
4
Upwardly Global

Upwardly global removes employment barriers for immigrant, refugee, and asylee professionals while advancing the inclusion of their skills into the u.s. economy.

Employment
5
Eastern Connecticut Workforce Investment Board Inc

EWIB efficiently coordinates employment-related services in concert with a multitude of state and local agencies at benefit to both businesses and job-seekers. These services offer new opportunities and/or skills to the regional workforce,…

Employment
6
Business - Higher Education Forum

The business-higher education forum is a national network that connects corporate and college leaders to identify and build the talent solutions that address priority talent needs for employers and the american economy. corporate…

Education
7
Workcred Inc

Formed in 2014, workcred is an affiliate of the american national standards institute (ansi). workcred's mission is to strengthen workforce quality by improving the credentialing system, ensuring its ongoing relevance, and preparing…

Public Benefit
8
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
9
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
10
National Skills Coalition

National skills coalition (nsc) fights for a national commitment to inclusive, high-quality skills training so that more people have access to a better life, and more local businesses see sustained growth. since 2000, through expert…

Community Improvement
11
The Attainment Network

The attainment network builds networks that transform education-to-workforce systems, erase persistent and pervasive equity gaps, expand opportunities for learners, and meet the economic demands for a highly skilled and educated workforce.

Education
12
Career Education Colleges and Universities

The career education colleges and universities (cecu) is the premier source of crucial information and public policy recommendations that promote access to career education and the importance of workforce development.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital Workforce Partners Inc; the most unlike its peers is Here to Here Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

238 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 238 of the 432 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
44
Early backer (in before they grew)
235/238
Grantees still filing
154/238
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $3,275,335 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASGENERAL ASSEMBLY SPACE INC: $1,747,506 · OtherEDX LLC: $1,314,231 · OtherDenver Public Schools: $1,292,597 · Other+107 more: $27,816,448 · Other+107 moreThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $944,500 · EducationThe Research Founda…HIGH TECH HIGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $779,927 · EducationHIGH TECH HIGH GRAD…TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE: $671,087 · EducationTEXAS COMMUNITY COL…LABOR INSTITUTE FOR TRAINING INC: $663,539 · EducationLABOR INSTITUTE FOR…LONG BEACH CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $616,000 · EducationLONG BEACH CITY COL…THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $551,747 · EducationTeachers College Columbia University: $519,482 · EducationOHIO ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $445,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $397,525 · EducationNew Hampshire Learning Initiative Inc: $377,700 · Education+34 more: $5,133,476 · Education+34 morePER SCHOLAS INC: $1,717,612 · EmploymentPER SCHOLAS INCBURNING GLASS INSTITUTE: $1,402,950 · EmploymentBURNING GLASS IN…KEYSTONE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $1,184,754 · EmploymentKEYSTONE DEVELOP…MICHIGAN STATE AFL-CIO WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $938,750 · EmploymentMICHIGAN STATE A…Chicago Federation of Labor Workforce and Community Initiative: $774,823 · EmploymentChicago Federati…HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND: $500,000 · EmploymentBOSTON PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC THE: $385,469 · Employment+15 more: $2,835,712 · Employment+15 moreWISCONSIN REGIONAL TRAINING PARTNERSHIP: $1,375,320 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $798,482 · PhilanthropyINLAND EMPIRE UNITED WAY: $767,000 · PhilanthropyTULARE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $426,940 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $272,473 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $242,375 · PhilanthropyNewark Alliance INC: $218,750 · Philanthropy+2 more: $205,001 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES: $1,957,030 · Social ScienceTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $460,675 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 · Social ScienceDallas County Local Workforce Development Board: $452,500 · Human ServicesEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $200,000 · Human ServicesWashington Academy for International Medical Gradu: $135,000 · Human ServicesINNERCITY STRUGGLE: $120,000 · Human ServicesCONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS EN NORTE AMERICA: $120,000 · Human ServicesCentral Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative: $90,000 · Human ServicesFSG INC: $337,500 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKFORCE BOARDS: $290,730 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY: $150,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $150,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT: $120,000 · Community Improvement
Other$35,446,117Education$11,099,983Employment$9,740,070Philanthropy$4,306,341Social Science$2,517,705Human Services$1,117,500Community Improvement$1,048,230

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES: $1,957,030 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $1,717,612 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetBURNING GLASS INSTITUTE: $1,402,950 over 2y, 10% of budgetWISCONSIN REGIONAL TRAINING PARTNERSHIP: $1,375,320 over 5y, 11% of budgetKEYSTONE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $1,184,754 over 8y, 62% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $944,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN STATE AFL-CIO WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $938,750 over 6y, 21% of budgetCHICAGO WOMEN IN TRADES: $827,929 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS: $800,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $798,482 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHIGH TECH HIGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $779,927 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetChicago Federation of Labor Workforce and Community Initiative: $774,823 over 4y, 12% of budgetINLAND EMPIRE UNITED WAY: $767,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetTEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE: $671,087 over 5y, 10% of budgetLABOR INSTITUTE FOR TRAINING INC: $663,539 over 4y, 31% of budgetLONG BEACH CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $616,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetJEVS HUMAN SERVICES: $603,062 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOAKLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $600,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $594,274 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $551,747 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $519,482 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPITALITY INDUSTRY TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND: $500,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $460,675 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDallas County Local Workforce Development Board: $452,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $445,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetUNIDOSUS: $437,723 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTULARE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $426,940 over 2y, 20% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $408,685 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $397,525 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBOSTON PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC THE: $385,469 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNew Hampshire Learning Initiative Inc: $377,700 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetUFCW REGION 8 STATES COUNCIL: $375,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetTHE MIGUEL CONTRERAS FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $350,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetWORKER EDUCATION & RESOURCE CENTER INC: $350,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC: $338,143 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFSG INC: $337,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCAPITAL WORKFORCE PARTNERS INC: $323,315 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAFL-CIO WORKING FOR AMERICA INSTITUTE: $313,693 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $298,324 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKFORCE BOARDS: $290,730 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetEMPLOY PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY: $289,375 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $285,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $272,473 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS FOR A SKILLED WORKFORCE INC: $267,885 over 3y, 12% of budgetROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $260,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STUDENT PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATORS INC: $258,436 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMACNYCALLAHAN MANAGEMENT TRAINING CENTER INC: $253,687 over 4y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BURNING GLASS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN REGIONAL TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN STATE AFL-CIO WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO WOMEN IN TRADES ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH TECH HIGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Federation of Labor Workforce and Community Initiative ↗
  • Who funds INLAND EMPIRE UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds LABOR INSTITUTE FOR TRAINING INC ↗
  • Who funds LONG BEACH CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEVS HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Association …The Aspen Institute I…Ascendium Education S…New America FoundationFoundation for Califo…Achieving the Dream I…Gates FoundationMdrcAmerican Association …College Futures Found…The James Irvine Foun…Truth Initiative Foun…
American Association of Community CollegesDC66× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Association of Community Colleges · The Aspen Institute Inc · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · New America Foundation · Foundation for California Community Colleges · Achieving the Dream Inc · Gates Foundation · Mdrc · American Association of Colleges and Universities · College Futures Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Truth Initiative Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jobs for the Future Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jobs for the Future Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Capital Workforce Partners Inc: 86% of income from government
  • Masshire Hampden County Workforce Board Inc: 72% of income from government
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • Education Development Center Inc: 65% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Newark Alliance Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology: 5% of income from government
  • University of New Haven: 2% of income from government
  • Employ Prince George's County: 1% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Achieving the Dream Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Portland State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
55report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 432 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jobs for the Future’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home