Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joanne and John Carter Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$193kHuman Services$156kEducation$83kReligion$61kFood & Nutrition$60kYouth Development$25kArts & Culture$22kAnimals$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$938k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF METRO DETROIT$13,000
BREAKTHROUGH FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$5,000
THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION$5,000
DETROIT REGIONAL DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$5,000
SENIOR MENS CLUB OF BIRMINGHAM FOUNDATION$2,500
DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$2,500
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$2,500
DETROIT CHILDREN'S CENTER$2,500
DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY$2,000
CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN$2,000
BEYOND BASICS$1,000
LAFAYETTE COLLEGE$1,000
UNITED WAY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE CHADTOUGH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%JUDSON CENTER: $10k → 8%BALDWIN CENTER: $2k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $8k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $8k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $8k → 8%BALDWIN CENTER: $1k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $7k → 8%BALDWIN CENTER: $500 → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MO
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Joanne and John Carter Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 61%.

Joanne and John Carter Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$617k · 48 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
17

Total granted

$617k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+48%

Still filing today

60%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JUDSON CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $44k · revenue +57%
  • CD
    CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2025 · $40k · revenue +195%
  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TK
    THE KENAN-FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +8%
  • LS
    LANDON SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +48%
  • AR
    A R T I S
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
3
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
4
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
5
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
6
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
7
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
8
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
9
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
10
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
11
Kalamazoo College

The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…

Education
12
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Detroit Children's Fund; the most unlike its peers is Keb Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
33/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUVENILE DIABETES RES FOUNDATION: $73,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RES FOUNDATIONYMCA OF METRO DETROIT: $62,750 · OtherYMCA OF METRO DETROITCHRIST CHURCH CRANBROOK: $55,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH CRANBROOKMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL CELIAC: $30,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL CELIACPENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $22,500 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYCAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $15,500 · OtherCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY: $15,000 · Other+38 more: $132,500 · Other+38 moreJUDSON CENTER INC: $43,500 · Human ServicesJUDSON CENTER INCCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesCHADTOUGH DEFEAT …WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR P…MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesMOORINGS PARK FOU…+1 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesTHE KENAN-FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationALMA COLLEGE: $7,500 · EducationLANDON SCHOOL: $6,000 · EducationBEYOND BASICS: $3,500 · EducationOAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education+4 more: $4,000 · EducationFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMON GROUND: $11,000 · HealthTHE RAINBOW CONNECTION: $11,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $9,000 · Health+2 more: $2,000 · HealthDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $13,500 · Recreation & SportsDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $15,000 · AnimalsNAPLES ZOO INC: $2,000 · Animals
Other$406,250Human Services$105,500Education$42,500Food & Nutrition$40,000Health$33,000Recreation & Sports$25,500Animals$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUDSON CENTER INC: $43,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KENAN-FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $13,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAINBOW CONNECTION: $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $10,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHAVEN INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLANDON SCHOOL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND BASICS: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BALDWIN CENTER INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNaples Music Club Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEB FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumble Design Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA CHI RHO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT CHILDREN'S FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWalsh College of Accountancy & Business Administration: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUDSON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KENAN-FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND ↗
  • Who funds THE RAINBOW CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALMA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds LANDON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds BRILLIANT DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BASICS ↗
  • Who funds THE BALDWIN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI26.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · The Carls Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Mihalich Charitable Foundation · Deroy Testamentary Foundation · Eagles for Children · Fca Foundation · Ethel and James Flinn Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joanne and John Carter Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joanne and John Carter Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joanne and John Carter Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joanne and John Carter Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joanne and John Carter Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph