Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jmn Charitable Association Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$24kInternational$23kEducation$4kFood & Nutrition$2kPhilanthropy$1kAnimals$819Health$313Human Services$215Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$211
Median grant
3
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$9,200
Divine Shakti Foundation$1,503
Individual grant recipient$501
Diabetes Association$211
Durga Temple VA$201
Individual grant recipient$153
MD Food Bank$101
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Divine Shakti Foundation: $9k → 15%American Red Cross: $105 → 14%Divine Shakti Foundation: $6k → 15%DIVINE SHAKTI FOUNDATIO: $4k → 15%DIVINE SHAKTI FOUNDATIO: $3k → 15%Divine Shakti Foundation: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 31% of Jmn Charitable Association Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 35% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 13%.

Jmn Charitable Association Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39k · 14 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +126% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
18

Total granted

$39k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+126%
+27%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionAnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DIVINE SHAKTI FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +217%
  • KB
    KRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +50%
  • TM
    THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $701 · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SA
    SANYAS ASHRAM USA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • TL
    Truth Love and Compassion Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • G
    GOFUNDMEORG
    one grant, 2022 · $525 · revenue -70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
5T Foundation

(a) To systematically propagate spiritual knowledge to society at large and to educate all peoples in the techniques of spiritual life in order to check the imbalance of values in life and to achieve real unity and peace in the world. To…

Religion
2
The Dharma Sanctuary
Religion
3
Hare Krishna Temple of Austin

The mission of the Hare Krishna Temple of Austin is to promote the practice of spiritual culture founded on the principles of peace love and happiness. Our spiritual practices include mantra meditation studying timeless texts such as…

Religion
4
Krishna Sankirtan Society

Vedic culture & food distributi

Religion
5
Bhaktivedanta Book Trust Intl Inc

1. assist devotees of krishna to fully and freely exercise their beliefs 2. aid the distribution of krishna conscious literature 3. aid the purchase,construction, renovation of temples 4.promote devotional service to sri krishna as the…

—
6
Bhakti Society Inc

The Bhakti Society is an educational non-profit that is established to share the universal spiritual path and practices of the Bhakti tradition.

Religion
7
I Mission

Helping the needy people in india and us .

—
8
India Heritage Research Foundation

To promote the understanding of india's cultural traditions, universal understanding and harmony; to publish the encyclopedia of hinduism; to organize lectures and seminars on various aspects of indian traditions; charitable activities…

Religion
9
Food Yoga International Inc

FFLGs mission is to bring about peace and in the world through the liberal of pure meals with loving intention. Food for Life Global pursues its by providing and operating support to Food for Lifes vegan hunger relief.

Human Services
10
Shiv Shakti Peeth Inc

Hindu Religious temple open to all people irrespective of religion, color and caste. Preaching and praying of principles of non- violence and brotherhood. Discourses on religious subjects.

Religion
11
Hanuman Maui

To establish a Hindu oriented temple ashram and community services center while preserving the home teachings and legacy of Ram Dass aka Richard Alpert and charitably supporting the community in the exploration of various spiritual…

Religion
12
Help Animals India

Help Animals India is a 501c3 organization dedicated to improving the lives and welfare of animals by providing financial and consultation to support and build capacity of animal rescue groups in India and Nepal while connecting donors…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Love Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Maryland Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $9,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,301 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSanskruti Foundation of USA: $3,814 · OtherSanskruti Foundation of USADURGA TEMPLE: $1,267 · OtherTruth Love and Compassion Inc: $1,100 · Other+22 more: $7,474 · Other+22 moreDIVINE SHAKTI FOUNDATION: $23,210 · Human ServicesDIVINE SHAKTI FOUNDATION+1 more: $105 · Human ServicesSANYAS ASHRAM USA: $3,342 · ReligionSANYAS AS…KRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH: $1,601 · ReligionKRISHNA B…GOFUNDMEORG: $525 · PhilanthropyCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $200 · AnimalsPET HELPERS INC: $104 · AnimalsTHE LOVE KITCHEN INC: $250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$27,156Human Services$23,315Religion$4,943Philanthropy$525Animals$304Food & Nutrition$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIVINE SHAKTI FOUNDATION: $23,210 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetSANYAS ASHRAM USA: $3,342 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetKRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH: $1,601 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $701 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION: $402 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOVE KITCHEN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET HELPERS INC: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIVINE SHAKTI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANYAS ASHRAM USA ↗
  • Who funds KRISHNA BHAKTI SEVA SANGH ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds INDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVE KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PET HELPERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jmn Charitable Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jmn Charitable Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jmn Charitable Association Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jmn Charitable Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jmn Charitable Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph