Skip to content
Jindhag Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jindhag Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$218kArts & Culture$46kHuman Services$37kEnvironment$10kInternational$10kHealth$7kCivil Rights$6kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DREPUNG LOSELING MONASTERY$14,550
THE BUDDHIST CENTER$8,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,250
MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO$1,000
THE STORY DANCER PROJECT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MI
NY
OR
OH
CA
VA
NM
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$287k · 15 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
24

Total granted

$287k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+44%

Still filing today

33%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2025 · $6k · revenue +40%
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE OPERA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +49%
  • SF
    SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • YE
    YUCATAN ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • OR
    OLIVE RUSH MEMORIAL STUDIO
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Santa Fe Botanical Garden

The santa fe botanical garden celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. in partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, science, conservation, community…

Environment
3
San Antonio Museum of Art

The San Antonio Museum of Art brings people together with art by collecting, preserving, and presenting significant works of art representing a broad range of history and cultures, advancing human connection and understanding, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
5
Smithsonian Institution

*increase and diffusion of knowledge* is the mission set forth by james smithson. the smithsonian endeavors to shape the future by preserving our heritage, discovering new knowledge, and sharing our resources with the world.

Arts & Culture
6
Santa Fe Institute

The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…

Science & Tech
7
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
8
National Institute of Mexican American History of Civil Rights
Civil Rights
9
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
10
The Helene Wurlitzer Foundation of New Mexico
—
11
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
12
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of New Mexico Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ibu Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DREPUNG LOSELING MONASTERY: $174,466 · OtherDREPUNG LOSELING MONASTERYIndividual grant recipient: $36,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,300 · Other+26 more: $99,864 · Other+26 moreMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE STORYDANCER PROJECT INC: $5,750 · Arts & CultureMONTPELIER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $4,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FOOD DEPOT: $5,000 · Human ServicesIBU Foundation: $2,500 · InternationalLOS ALAMOS STUDY GROUP: $1,500 · InternationalALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $1,500 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc: $750 · Health
Other$335,430Arts & Culture$21,750Human Services$5,000International$4,000Education$1,500Health$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STORYDANCER PROJECT INC: $5,750 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMending Kids International dba Mending Kids: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONTPELIER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIBU Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHistoric Santa Fe Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ALAMOS STUDY GROUP: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE STORYDANCER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds Mending Kids International dba Mending Kids ↗
  • Who funds MONTPELIER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds IBU Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Historic Santa Fe Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALAMOS STUDY GROUP ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jindhag Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jindhag Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jindhag’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home