Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jim & Ruth Couture Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$239kEducation$104kInternational$3kHuman Services$1kHealth$1kYouth Development$512Housing & Shelter$391Food & Nutrition$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$42k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL SAINTS ACADEMY$17,100
ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH$12,575
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WORCESTER$1,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $702) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PINE STREET INN: $202 → 16%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $300 → 26%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
SD
PA
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
DC
OK
MS
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$338k · 12 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
73

Total granted

$338k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-41%
+84%

Still filing today

8%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPHS CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $163k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2018–2025 · $41k
  • BM
    BISHOP MARSHALL SCHOOL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $40k

Funded once

  • O
    OSDPC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $900
  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NAHA
    one grant, 2018 · $900
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
3
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
4
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
5
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
6
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
7
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
8
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
9
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
10
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
11
Hunger Free America Inc

Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.

—
12
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPHS CHURCH: $163,320 · OtherST JOSEPHS CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $40,518 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBISHOP MARSHALL SCHOOL: $40,270 · OtherBISHOP MARSHALL SCHOOLALL SAINTS ACADEMY: $34,160 · OtherALL SAINTS ACADEMYST AMBROSE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25,870 · OtherST AMBROSE CATHOLIC SCHOOLCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WORCESTER: $18,000 · Other+68 more: $24,774 · Other+68 moreHAITI OUTREACH INC: $3,050 · International+1 more: $50 · InternationalCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $300 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC: $202 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $200 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $35 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $21 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $200 · Recreation & SportsFeeding America: $150 · Food & NutritionWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $50 · Food & NutritionBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC: $89 · Housing & Shelter
Other$346,912International$3,100Human Services$702Health$206Recreation & Sports$200Food & Nutrition$200Housing & Shelter$89

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAITI OUTREACH INC: $3,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $202 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES FOR HOPE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC: $89 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PRO-LIFE ALLIANCE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFITCHBURG ART MUSEUM: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNASHUA RIVER WATERSHED ASSOC INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAITI OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jim & Ruth Couture Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jim & Ruth Couture Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nashua River Watershed Assoc Inc: 54% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Fitchburg Art Museum: 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jim & Ruth Couture’s filings →

More from the funding graph