Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jim & Kristen Hamel Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$253k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$360kEducation$360kHuman Services$263kRecreation & Sports$199kYouth Development$166kHealth$137kAnimals$115kInternational$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Casa Guadalupe Education Center$50,000
Habitat for Humanity of WA & Dodge Co$30,000
Secure Futures$25,000
The National Horse Show (NHS)$25,000
Mitchell School Booster Club$25,000
Family Promise of Washington County$20,000
Family Promise$10,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Washington County$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Glenayre Equestrian Program$10,000
Danny and Ron's Rescue$7,500
Wheeler County Fire & Rescue$5,500
Richfield Historical Society$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Wheeler County Communities$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $288k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Advisor's Give Back: $10k → 10%Paws with a Cause: $2k → 10%Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $10k → 10%Glenayre Equestrian Program: $10k → 7%Paws with a Cause: $2k → 10%Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $5k → 10%Secure Futures: $25k → 17%Glenayre Equestrian Program: $10k → 7%Paws with a Cause: $1k → 10%Secure Futures: $25k → 17%Glenayre Equestrian Program: $8k → 7%Secure Futures: $25k → 17%Secure Futures: $25k → 17%Glenayre Equestrian Program: $3k → 7%Secure Futures: $20k → 17%Secure Futures Foundation: $5k → 17%Casa Guadalupe Education Center: $50k → 6%Casa Guadalupe Education Center: $25k → 6%Casa Guadalupe Education Center: $25k → 6%Casa Guadalupe Education Center: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
MI
OR
NJ
CA
KY
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 22 repeat orgs$443k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
25

Total granted

$1.4M
$368k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+22%

Still filing today

55%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $125k · revenue +115%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +417%
  • CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $103k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +7% · 26% of their budget
  • U
    USHJA
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
2
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
3
Hooves & Paws Rescue of the Heartland

Continue to provide rescues of horses,donkeys, and large dogs

Animals
4
Dodge County Humane Society Inc

Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.

Animals
5
Habitat for Humanity of Wisconsin Inc

Our mission is to empower WI Habitat for Humanity affiliates to create one voice that advocates and influences affordable home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
6
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Wisconsin Inc

To create and support one-on-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
7
Humane Society of the Lakes

To provide services for abandoned, stray or unwanted animals while they await life long homes. our vision is that all animals are cared for with dignity and respect.

Animals
8
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
9
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northwestern Wisconsin Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth

—
10
Helping Hounds Dog Rescue Inc

Helping hounds dog rescue provides a compassionate approach to dog rescue by matching homeless dogs from overcrowded shelter systems with loving homes.

Animals
11
Canines for Service Inc

CFS seeks to inspire veterans through life-changing canine partnerships.

Human Services
12
Herding Dog Rescue of Central Oregon

Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Washington County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peeps Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mitchell School Booster Club: $160,000 · OtherMitchell School Booster ClubIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCasa Guadalupe: $75,000 · OtherCasa GuadalupeReins Equine Assisted Therapy Inc: $65,000 · OtherReins Equine Assisted Therapy IncUSHJA Foundation Hamel Scholarship Fund: $60,000 · OtherUSHJA Foundation Hamel Scholarship FundBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $50,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $50,000 · OtherWHEELER COUNTY COMMUNITIES INC: $40,000 · Other+32 more: $460,377 · Other+32 moreSECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesSECUREFUTURES FOU…CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $102,500 · Human ServicesCASA GUADALUPE ED…GLENEAYRE EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesGLENEAYRE EQUESTR…Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $15,000 · Human ServicesADVISERS GIVE BACK INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $220,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMIS…COMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS: $105,000 · HealthUSHJA FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $42,500 · AnimalsPeeps Foundation Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsRICHFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $50,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,110,377Human Services$287,500Housing & Shelter$220,000Health$105,000Recreation & Sports$55,000Animals$52,500Arts & Culture$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $220,000 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetSECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS: $105,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $102,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetUSHJA FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetRICHFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $42,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetGLENEAYRE EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetVeterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetADVISERS GIVE BACK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetUNITED SPECIAL SPORTSMAN ALLIANCE I: $9,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGROUNDWORK MILWAUKEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDogs to Dog Tags Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds USHJA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds GLENEAYRE EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS WI SHORELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Peeps Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADVISERS GIVE BACK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jim & Kristen Hamel Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jim & Kristen Hamel Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Community Counseling Solutions: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jim & Kristen Hamel Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jim & Kristen Hamel Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jim & Kristen Hamel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph