Skip to content
Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$637kPhilanthropy$547kRecreation & Sports$544kAnimals$158kReligion$152kArts & Culture$148kHealth$100kHuman Services$95kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k34 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINTS ANDREW AND MATTHIAS CHURCH$25,000
RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY$19,077
HOLLAND ZEELAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
GRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY$12,000
GATEWAY MISSION$6,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$5,550
KENT COUNTY ORANGE CRUSHERS$5,500
HAVEN MISSIONARY HOMES$5,000
MICHIGAN FAMILY FORMUM$5,000
HOLLAND HISTORIAL TRUST$5,000
EVERGREEN COMMONS$5,000
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$5,000
HOLLAND FISH AND GAME CLUB$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EVERGREEN COMMONS: $18k → 10%EVERGREEN COMMONS: $9k → 10%RESILIENCE: $1k → 8%RESILIENCE: $1k → 8%HOSPICE OF HOLLAND: $5k → 10%RESILIENCE: $1k → 8%EVERGREEN COMMONS: $5k → 10%EVERGREEN COMMONS: $5k → 10%RESILIENCE: $1k → 8%RESILIENCE: $1k → 8%EVERGREEN COMMONS: $5k → 10%BENJAMIN'S HOPE: $1k → 8%CAMP SUNSHINE: $500 → 8%CAMP SUNSHINE: $500 → 8%CAMP SUNSHINE: $500 → 8%WINGS OF MERCY: $250 → 8%HOSPICE OF HOLLAND: $2k → 10%HOSPICE OF HOLLAND: $2k → 10%HOSPICE OF HOLLAND: $1k → 10%HOSPICE OF HOLLAND: $1k → 10%HOSPICE OF HOLLAND: $1k → 10%EVERGREEN COMMONS: $1k → 10%CAMP SUNSHINE: $500 → 10%CAMP SUNSHINE: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
MA
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
AZ
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 40 repeat orgs$671k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
25

Total granted

$1.4M
$648k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+38%

Still filing today

55%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ON
    ODC NETWORK
    4× · 2019–2022 · $86k · revenue +297%
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION OF WEST MICHIGAN
    2× · 2021–2023 · $66k · revenue +9%
  • EC
    EVERGREEN COMMONS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $43k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF HOLLAND ICE RINK FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • HC
    Holland Community Aquatic Center Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -93%
  • CS
    CONNETICUT SHOTGUN MANUFACTURING COMPANY
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
2
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
3
The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc

The community foundation of the holland/zeeland area seeks to ensure that our community thrives today, tomorrow, and forever by building our community's endowment to support high impact charitable projects, helping donors achieve their…

Philanthropy
4
Kalamazoo College

The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…

Education
5
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
6
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
7
Holland Home

In fulfilling God's calling to serve others, the organization will service aged persons (1) with love and compassion, (2) with a commitment to excellence, and (3) follow Christ's teachings and example in all that the organization does.

Human Services
8
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
9
Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy

The mission of gtrlc is to protect significant natural, scenic and farm lands and advance land stewardship now and for future generations.

Environment
10
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
11
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

We, trinity health grand haven hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity health grand haven hospital is a member of trinity…

Health
12
Michigan West Coast Chamber of Commerce

The west coast chamber exists to be a catalyst for business growth and development, a convener of leaders and influencers, and a champion for a thriving community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Rapids Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wings of Mercy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
26/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLLAND ZEELAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $519,500 · OtherHOLLAND ZEELAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCITY OF HOLLAND ICE RINK FUND: $500,000 · OtherCITY OF HOLLAND ICE RINK FUNDCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $79,170 · OtherRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY: $71,177 · OtherGRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY: $67,000 · Other+49 more: $470,898 · Other+49 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $555,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE+4 more: $27,500 · EducationODC NETWORK: $86,000 · AnimalsTHE UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · AnimalsMENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION OF WEST MICHIGAN: $66,333 · HealthCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $15,000 · HealthLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $3,200 · HealthEVERGREEN COMMONS: $42,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF HOLLAND INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $5,000 · Human ServicesPINE REST FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesCAMP SUNSHINE: $2,200 · Human Services+2 more: $1,250 · Human ServicesHolland Community Aquatic Center Foundation: $25,000 · Arts & CultureHOLLAND MUSEUM: $17,500 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL TRUST FOR SCOTLAND FOUNDATION USA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHOLLAND AMERICAN LEGION BAND: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $41,500 · ReligionHAVEN MISSIONARY HOMES: $5,000 · Religion
Other$1,707,745Education$582,500Animals$89,500Health$84,533Human Services$65,450Arts & Culture$56,000Religion$46,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $555,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetODC NETWORK: $86,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION OF WEST MICHIGAN: $66,333 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetEVERGREEN COMMONS: $42,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $41,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND: $29,750 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHolland Community Aquatic Center Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLAND MUSEUM: $17,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLAND ROTARY CHARITIES: $12,500 over 1y, 52% of budgetHOSPICE OF HOLLAND INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL TRUST FOR SCOTLAND FOUNDATION USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetARIZONA OUTDOOR ADVENTURES INC: $10,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetCENTRAL COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLAND FISH & GAME CLUB: $7,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetHOMECOR: $7,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetHOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY: $5,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN MISSIONARY HOMES: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetPENTWATER ARTISAN LEARNING CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSTEPHEN'S CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS & SCULPTURE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESHORE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $3,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY INC DBA FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLAND AMERICAN LEGION BAND: $2,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPINE REST FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE: $2,200 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER OTTAWA COUNTY UNITED WAY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVAN ANDEL INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENJAMIN'S HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACKINAC CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF MERCY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ODC NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION OF WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN COMMONS ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Holland Community Aquatic Center Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLAND MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HOLLAND ROTARY CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF HOLLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL TRUST FOR SCOTLAND FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA OUTDOOR ADVENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HOLLAND FISH & GAME CLUB ↗
  • Who funds HOMECOR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…John and Judy Spoelho…Edgar and Elsa Prince…Grand Haven Area Comm…Howard Miller Foundat…Dick and Betsy Devos …Grand Rapids Communit…Douglas & Sandra Deko…The Samuel L Westerma…Peter C & Emajean Coo…Stephen and Valerie S…De Witt Families Cond…
The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area IncMI58.5× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · John and Judy Spoelhof Foundation · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Howard Miller Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · The Samuel L Westerman Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Stephen and Valerie Spoelhof Foundation · De Witt Families Conduit Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jim and Ginger Jurries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home