Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jhsi Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14M
Granted FY2020
32
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2020.

Education$11MHealth$9.9MPhilanthropy$8.1MReligion$7.3MRecreation & Sports$2.6MHuman Services$1.7MEmployment$1.2MArts & Culture$585kOther$0
02FY2020 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+12 grants · $13M
$146,700
Median grant
4
States reached
$218M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mercy Health Foundation$3,255,702
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati$2,500,000
Rockwern Academy$1,377,200
Individual grant recipient$1,198,563
Hebrew Union College - JIR$993,301
Cincinnati Hebrew Day School$820,500
JVS Career Services$591,839
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati$536,420
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati$480,500
Mayerson JCC$473,788
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati$296,538
Jewish Family Service$292,608
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati$210,500
Jewish Discovery Center of Ohio Inc$181,250
Hillel of University of Cincinnati$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Jewish Discovery Center of Ohio Inc: $181k → 6%Wexner Foundation: $175k → 15%Hebrew Union College - JIR: $993k → 16%JEWISH DISCOVERY CENTER OF OHIO INC: $179k → 6%HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION: $834k → 16%Jewish Discovery Center of Ohio Inc: $150k → 6%Hebrew Union College - JIR: $559k → 16%Hillel of University of Cincinnati: $150k → 16%ROCKWERN ACADEMY: $3.1M → 16%Rockwern Academy: $3.0M → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $2.5M → 16%Community Congregations: $1.4M → 16%Rockwern Academy: $1.4M → 16%Mayerson JCC: $1.3M → 16%Community Congregations: $1.2M → 16%COMMUNITY CONGREGATIONS: $960k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI: $917k → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $633k → 16%MAYERSON JCC: $553k → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $536k → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $527k → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $481k → 16%Mayerson JCC: $474k → 16%HOLOCAUST AND HUMANITY CENTER: $400k → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $358k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI: $347k → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $297k → 16%Jewish Family Service: $293k → 16%Jewish Family Service: $282k → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $269k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI: $243k → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $211k → 16%Jewish Family Service: $152k → 16%Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $149k → 16%Jewish Family Service: $147k → 16%Jewish Family Service: $139k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI: $138k → 16%Cincinnati Children's Hospital MC: $156k → 16%Mercy Health Foundation: $3.4M → 16%Mercy Health Foundation: $3.3M → 16%CINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $1.7M → 16%Cincinnati Hebrew Day School: $821k → 16%Cincinnati Hebrew Day School: $763k → 16%CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $140k → 16%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $3.3M → 16%JVS Career Services: $592k → 16%JVS Career Services: $352k → 16%JVS CAREER SERVICES: $269k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33M · 19 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$33M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+57%

Still filing today

53%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
EducationArts & CultureReligionRecreation & SportsHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation
    3× · 2018–2020 · $9.9M · revenue +234%
  • YD
    Yavneh Day School Association
    3× · 2018–2020 · $7.5M · revenue +52% · 55% of their budget
  • CH
    CINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $3.2M · revenue +35% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

  • HU
    HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION
    one grant, 2018 · $884k
  • TC
    The Center for Holocaust and Humanity Educationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $400k · revenue +196%
  • WF
    WEXNER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $175k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
2
Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc
Health
3
JewishColumbus

Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.

Religion
4
Jewish Federation of Columbus

Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area

A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…

Human Services
6
Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. serves the burial needs of the Greater Cincinnati Jewish community with care and dignity and honors the resting places of our people.

—
7
Columbus Jewish Foundation

Make Jewish life vibrant, safe, and accessible in Columbus, Israel, and around the world.

Philanthropy
8
Columbus Jewish Historical Society

To facilitate the collection, preservation and education of the jewish history of central ohio.

Arts & Culture
9
Cleveland Hillel Foundation Inc

Center of jewish life for undergraduate, graduate and professional students who attend 11 colleges and universities in greater cleveland. provides the means for students to celebrate their judaism through enriching cultural, educational,…

Philanthropy
10
University of Judaism Foundation
—
11
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
12
Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation

The Mt. Sinai Health Foundation improves the health of Greater Cleveland by investing resources, convening, and collaborating - with a focus on: - Equitable health outcomes- Health of the Jewish community- Academic medicine and bioscience…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Cincinnati; the most unlike its peers is Wexner Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Yavneh Day School Association: $7,533,372 · EducationYavneh Day School Associatio…CINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC: $3,239,034 · EducationCINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL…+1 more: $197,936 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $3,563,523 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHebrew Union College - JIR: $1,601,801 · OtherHebrew Union College - JIRJewish Family Service: $1,567,861 · OtherJewish Family ServiceJVS Career Services: $1,212,580 · OtherJVS Career ServicesHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION: $883,962 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH …JEWISH DISCOVERY CENTER OF OHIO: $510,000 · Other+13 more: $1,396,844 · Other+13 moreBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $9,902,940 · ReligionBon Secours Mercy Health F…+1 more: $50,000 · ReligionJewish Federation of Cincinnati: $7,872,085 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of…Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnati: $2,390,068 · Recreation & SportsCamp Livingston Inc: $210,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education: $400,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC HALL REVITALIZATION COMPANY INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $140,199 · Community ImprovementCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $84,131 · HealthJEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Health
Education$10,970,342Other$10,736,571Religion$9,952,940Philanthropy$7,872,085Recreation & Sports$2,600,068Arts & Culture$510,000Community Improvement$140,199Health$109,131

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $9,902,940 over 3y, 12% of budgetJewish Federation of Cincinnati: $7,872,085 over 3y, 14% of budgetYavneh Day School Association: $7,533,372 over 3y, 55% of budgetCINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC: $3,239,034 over 3y, 35% of budgetJewish Community Center Of Cincinnati: $2,390,068 over 3y, 11% of budgetThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education: $400,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetCamp Livingston Inc: $210,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $197,936 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHillel Foundation at Miami University: $185,282 over 3y, 21% of budgetCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $140,199 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCedar Village Foundation: $129,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $84,131 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC HALL REVITALIZATION COMPANY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetHillel the Foundation of Jewish Campus Life: $56,250 over 1y, 11% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISH FESTIVAL: $25,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetJEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds Yavneh Day School Association ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds The Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education ↗
  • Who funds Camp Livingston Inc ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Hillel Foundation at Miami University ↗
  • Who funds WEXNER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cedar Village Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC HALL REVITALIZATION COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds Hillel the Foundation of Jewish Campus Life ↗
  • Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds ISH FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of CincinnatiOH17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Cincinnati · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jhsi Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jhsi Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jhsi Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jhsi Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jhsi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph