Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jhaveri Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$328kEducation$150kInternational$12kReligion$12kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$7kYouth Development$4kCommunity Improvement$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$644k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUNI SEVA ASHRAM INC$10,000
NIVIDITA FOUNDATION USA$10,000
NIVIDITA FOUNDATION USA$10,000
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSP$8,000
YUVA PRAGATI FOUNDATION$5,000
IGG4 WARD FOUNDATION INC$2,000
LAD VANIK SAMAJ OF NA$1,801
FOOD BANK NETWORK OF SOMERSET$1,000
WOMENS REHABILITATION GROUP$1,000
SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION INC$1,000
HEART AND HAND FOR HANDICAPPED$1,000
ST PETERS FOUNDATION$500
HEART AND HAND FOR HANDICAPPED$500
NAVKAR CENTER USA INC$500
GANDEVI SAMAJ OF NA$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $175 → 14%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $1k → 17%BAPS CHARITIES: $501 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
KS
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Jhaveri Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 21% of the giving stays in NJ; read by stated purpose it is 15% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Jhaveri Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$499k · 32 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
26

Total granted

$499k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+40%

Still filing today

38%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
    5× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +102%
  • WR
    WOMENS REHABILITATION GROUP
    7× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +55%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • SR
    SHRIMAD RAJCHANDRA MISSION DHARMPUR
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • NK
    National Kidney Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Shriners Hospitals for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
3
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
4
International Eye Foundation

International eye foundation works to prevent blindness and restore sight by building capacity for quality, comprehensive and sustainable eye care services worldwide.

International
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

7
Urology Care Foundation Inc

We support, through philanthropic efforts, the improvement of urological care globally by funding research, clinical education, patient education, and humanitarian programs.

Health
8
Shiv Nadar Foundation

Shiv Nadar Foundation provides access to higher education tounderprivileged students and funds to other charitable organizations to supporteducation, research, social policies for women empowerment, affordable healthcareservices, medical…

Education
9
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
10
Global Health Research Foundation
11
Intelehealth Inc

Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to…

International
12
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share and Care Foundation for India and the most unlike its peers is The Food Bank Network of Somerset County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%56%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,543

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUNI SEVA ASHRAM INC — $132,000 · OtherMUNI SEVA ASHRAM INCHEART AND HAND FOR THE HANDICAPPED LTD — $59,450 · OtherHEART AND HAND FOR THE HANDICAPPED LTDSISTER NIVIDITA FOUNDATION — $38,000 · OtherSISTER NIVIDITA FOUNDATIONBAPS CHARITABLE INC — $35,001 · OtherBAPS CHARITABLE INCMUNI SEVA ASHRAM FOUNDATION — $25,125 · OtherMUNI SEVA ASHRAM FOUNDATIONYUVA PRAGATI FOUNDATION — $22,000 · OtherYUVA PRAGATI FOUNDATION+37 more — $80,337 · Other+37 moreSISTER NIVEDITA FOUNDATION USA INC — $80,000 · InternationalSISTER NIVEDITA FOU…SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA — $6,500 · InternationalSHARE AND CARE FOUN…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $4,691 · International+1 more — $500 · InternationalSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA — $24,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $3,000 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $1,750 · Health+1 more — $690 · HealthIGG4WARD FOUNDATION — $7,285 · EducationDURHAM ACADEMY INC — $1,500 · EducationEVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 202 ED FOUNDATION — $500 · Education+1 more — $100 · EducationGirls on the Run of the Triangle Inc — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE FOOD BANK NETWORK OF SOMERSET COUNTY INC — $1,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $1,000 · Food & NutritionMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesBAPS CHARITIES INC — $501 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $175 · Human Services
Other$391,913International$91,691Health$29,440Education$9,385Recreation & Sports$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,000Human Services$1,676

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSISTER NIVEDITA FOUNDATION USA INC — $80,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetHEART AND HAND FOR THE HANDICAPPED LTD — $59,450 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA — $24,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIGG4WARD FOUNDATION — $7,285 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA — $6,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS REHABILITATION GROUP — $6,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $4,691 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGirls on the Run of the Triangle Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PETER'S FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM ACADEMY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $690 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE GLOBAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 202 ED FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SISTER NIVEDITA FOUNDATION USA INC
  • Who funds HEART AND HAND FOR THE HANDICAPPED LTD
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
  • Who funds IGG4WARD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA
  • Who funds WOMENS REHABILITATION GROUP
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds Girls on the Run of the Triangle Inc
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ST PETER'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DURHAM ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK NETWORK OF SOMERSET COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Feeding America

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jhaveri Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jhaveri Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jhaveri Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph