Skip to content
Jewish Hospital & St Mary's Healthcare Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Jewish Hospital & St Mary's Healthcare Inc

To bring hope, improve health and change lives.

$375k
Granted FY2020
2
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$1.3MEducation$422kHuman Services$402kReligion$101kFood & Nutrition$80kScience & Tech$68kArts & Culture$45kInternational$23kOther$0
02FY2020 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $170,335, the rows itemized in this filing. The $375,458 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $205,123 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $153k
$152,830
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTINE M KLEINERT INSTITUTE$152,830
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$17,505
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $402k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Center For Women & Families: $156k → 15%CENTER FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES: $133k → 15%CENTER FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES: $113k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 6 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$2.1M
$340k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+179%

Still filing today

83%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $402k · revenue +11%
  • UM
    UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $368k · revenue +130%
  • UO
    University of Louisville Research Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $239k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • TF
    The Food Literacy Project at Oxmoor Farm Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $80k · revenue +209%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE
    one grant, 2017 · $73k
  • QS
    QUESGEN SYSTEMS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $51k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
University of Louisville Real Estate Foundation Inc

To acquire, maintain, improve, leverage, manage, lease, and convey real and personal property for the benefit of the university of louisville.

Philanthropy
3
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Louisville Medical Center Development Corporation

To hold and administer tax increment financing (tif) for real estate projects.

—
6
University of Louisville Physicians Inc

Provide professional medical services in a variety of medical specialties and disciplines in accordance with the corporation's charitable mission: strengthen and broaden the range of skills and patient populations available for physicians…

Health
7
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
9
Uofl Health-Shelbyville Inc

To operate and maintain a hospital affiliated with the university of louisville school of medicine and to provide care for the people who are in need of those, or related, medical services.

Health
10
Lafayette General Foundation Inc

The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…

Health
11
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Louisville Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Food Literacy Project at Oxmoor Farm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTINE M KLEINERT INSTITUTE: $915,688 · OtherCHRISTINE M KLEINERT INSTITUTESISTERS OF CHARITY OF NAZARETH INC: $94,900 · OtherSISTERS OF CHARITY OF NAZARETH INCUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $73,074 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLEQUESGEN SYSTEMS INC: $50,787 · Other+6 more: $103,230 · Other+6 moreTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $401,840 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR WOM…UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $368,105 · HealthUNIVERSITY MEDIC…University of Louisville Research Foundation: $238,670 · EducationUniversity of Lo…UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $128,024 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LO…The Food Literacy Project at Oxmoor Farm Inc: $80,000 · Food & NutritionPEACE EDUCATION PROGRAM INC: $23,021 · InternationalTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,237,679Human Services$401,840Health$368,105Education$366,694Food & Nutrition$80,000International$23,021Philanthropy$20,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTINE M KLEINERT INSTITUTE: $915,688 over 4y, 45% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $401,840 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $368,105 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation: $238,670 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $128,024 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Food Literacy Project at Oxmoor Farm Inc: $80,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetAMELIA BROWN FRAZIER REHAB CTR INC BOARD DI: $38,845 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEACE EDUCATION PROGRAM INC: $23,021 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORGAN PROCUREMENT AGENCY OF MICHIGAN: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHAS CRUSADE FOR CHILDREN INC: $6,057 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The Community Foundat…Legacy Foundation of …Kosair Charities Comm…Metro United Way IncThe Community Foundat…Jewish Heritage Fund …Charles L Weisberg Fa…Norton Healthcare IncRepublic Bank Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…Baird Foundation Inc
The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Legacy Foundation of Kentuckiana Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Metro United Way Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Jewish Heritage Fund for Excellence Inc · Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation · Norton Healthcare Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jewish Hospital & St Mary's Healthcare Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Hospital & St Mary's Healthcare Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jewish Hospital & St Mary's Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home