Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange County

Support the jewish community.

$831k
Granted FY2019
14
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$442k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange County’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Greater Long Beach & West Orange County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

17
17
20
18
13
19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2019 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $625,130 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $831,427 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $206,297 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $155k
  • $250k+1 grant · $442k
$11,125
Median grant
3
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH$442,498
ALPERT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$33,096
TEMPLE ISRAEL$31,216
LONG BEACH SYMPHONY$20,755
BOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$15,000
INTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE$12,500
LONG BEACH RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$11,125
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE$10,960
LOS ANGELES MUSEUM OF THE HOLOCAUST$10,000
WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY$10,000
HEBREW ACADEMY$8,680
ABLE ARTS WORK$7,000
TEMPLE BETH DAVID$6,800
MUSICAL THEATRE WEST$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ABLE ARTS WORK: $7k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $22k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $14k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange County’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange Countylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$736k · 18 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2019, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$736k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+47%

Still filing today

72%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LONG BEACH AND ORANGE COUNTY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $46k · revenue +171%
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $45k · revenue +32%
  • LB
    Long Beach Symphony Association
    3× · 2017–2019 · $43k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • WU
    Water Undergroundgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +47%
  • BC
    BE CARE LOVE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • JI
    JQ INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

2
Jewish Community Center of Long Beach

To develop and strengthen Jewish identity, foster Jewish values, and enrich the community of Long Beach and West Orange County.

Human Services
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
5
Long Beach State Foundation

The foundation seeks, secures and manages private support for california state university, long beach. (see schedule o)as the philanthropic foundation for the university, all donations in support of our students, faculty, programs and…

Education
6
Hillel Jewish University Center

To enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

7
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
8
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
9
California State University Los Angeles Alumni Association Inc

To foster relationships among alumni, students and community by providing services and activities that build loyalty, support and a lifelong connection to the university.

10
Ucla Alumni Association

The mission of the ucla alumni association is to enrich the lives of alumni and involve them in the future of ucla.

Education
11
Brown Hillel Foundation

Brown risd hillel encourages and supports a diversity of students as they explore, develop and deepen their jewish identities. we are committed to having judaism serve as a source of meaning and growth during their time on college hill and…

12
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange County and the most unlike its peers is Water Underground. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Performing Arts Organizatio…Art Museums and GalleriesCommunity Health CentersAffordable Housing Developm…University Support Foundati…International Child Welfare
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr10%26%35–55yr12%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%10%20–35yr10%12%35–55yr12%77%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 7% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
2/27
the rest of the field
15%
9,955/65,087

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
20/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTY — $1,332,506 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTYTEMPLE ISRAEL — $162,003 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELHILLEL ADVISORY COUNCIL OF GREATER LONG BEACH AND WEST ORANGE COUNTY INC — $96,210 · OtherHILLEL ADVISORY COUNCIL OF GREATER LONG BEACH AND WEST ORANGE COUNTY INCALPERT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $68,744 · Other+8 more — $142,785 · Other+8 moreINTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE — $45,100 · Arts & CultureLong Beach Symphony Association — $42,755 · Arts & CultureLONG BEACH OPERA — $15,250 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $15,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICAL THEATRE WEST — $11,500 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $36,300 · EducationBOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College — $5,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $70,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LONG BEACH AND ORANGE COUNTY — $46,313 · Human ServicesARTS AND SERVICES FOR DISABLED INC DBA ABLE ARTS WORK — $7,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $20,000 · InternationalWater Underground — $20,000 · InternationalCONFLUENCE RISING — $33,700 · Civil Rights
Other$1,802,248Arts & Culture$129,605Education$71,300Philanthropy$70,000Human Services$53,313International$40,000Civil Rights$33,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTY — $1,332,506 over 3y, 19% of budgetHILLEL ADVISORY COUNCIL OF GREATER LONG BEACH AND WEST ORANGE COUNTY INC — $96,210 over 2y, 13% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LONG BEACH AND ORANGE COUNTY — $46,313 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE — $45,100 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetLong Beach Symphony Association — $42,755 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $36,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONFLUENCE RISING — $33,700 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLONG BEACH JEWISH COMMUNITY SENIOR HOUSING DBA FEDERATION TOWER — $18,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLONG BEACH OPERA — $15,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEMPLE BETH DAVID OF ORANGE COUNTY FOUNDATION — $14,480 over 2y, 30% of budgetMUSICAL THEATRE WEST — $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARTS AND SERVICES FOR DISABLED INC DBA ABLE ARTS WORK — $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY OF HOPE — $6,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange CountyCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange County · Long Beach Community Foundation · The RuMBa Foundation of Long Beach · Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · Public Corp for the Arts of the City of Long Beach · Bess J Hodges Foundation · Keesal Young & Logan Charitable Foundation · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Long Beach & West Orange County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph