Skip to content

· Public charity

Jewish Community Alliance Southern Maine

To coordinate, promote, and support the Jewish philanthropic, benevolent, educational, and communal activities in Southern Maine.

$150k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$196kPhilanthropy$143kInternational$5k
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $118,301, the rows itemized in this filing. The $150,485 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,184 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,297
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jerusalem Federation of North America$40,744
Levey Day School$25,000
Congregation Bet Ha'am$15,297
JCA of Southern Maine$14,000
Temple Beth El$13,260
Yad L'Kashish$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Yad L'Kashish: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$172k · 3 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

$172k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+90%

Still filing today

33%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’22
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LD
    LEVEY DAY SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $77k · revenue +71%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BET HAAM
    7× · 2017–2024 · $59k
  • TB
    Temple Beth El
    7× · 2017–2024 · $36k

Funded once

  • THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INCgraduated
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Life Foundation
—
2
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Alevy Family Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
7
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
8
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
10
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
11
Keren Yad Le-Yosef Foundation Trust
—
12
Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc

Jewish national fund gives all generations of jews a unique voice in building a prosperous future for the land of israel and its people.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Leket Israel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Levey Day School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEVEY DAY SCHOOL: $76,765 · OtherLEVEY DAY SCHOOLCONGREGATION BET HAAM: $59,347 · OtherCONGREGATION BET HAAMTemple Beth El: $35,860 · OtherTemple Beth ElTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $143,181 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INCJewish Community Alliance Southern Maine: $14,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Community Alliance Southern MaineFriends of Yad LKashishLifeline for the Old: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $5,000 · International
Other$171,972Philanthropy$157,181Human Services$10,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $143,181 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEVEY DAY SCHOOL: $76,765 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetJewish Community Alliance Southern Maine: $14,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of Yad LKashishLifeline for the Old: $10,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LEVEY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Community Alliance Southern Maine ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Yad LKashishLifeline for the Old ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jewish Community Alliance Southern Maine funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewish Community Alliance Southern Maine. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $161k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jewish Community Alliance Southern Maine’s filings →

    More from the funding graph