· Private foundation
Jewell Foundation Limited
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $90k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER | $10,000 |
| MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM | $6,000 |
| DOLORES HUERTA FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| POSITIVE COMMUNICATIONS PRACTICES | $6,000 |
| GLEN ECHO PARK PARTNERSHIP | $5,000 |
| C & O CANAL TRUST | $5,000 |
| POTOMAC CONSERVANCY | $4,000 |
| COMMUNITY WATER CENTER | $4,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $3,500 |
| MARYLAND CITIZENS' HEALTH INTIATIVE EDUCATION FUND INC | $3,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD METRO DC | $3,000 |
| THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS | $3,000 |
| ACTBLUE CHARITIES INC | $3,000 |
| CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.
54 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- EBEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER8× · 2018–2025 · $56k · revenue +33%
- PUPRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +207%
- TPTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- PFPHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTH PROGRAMone grant, 2017 · $12k
- BCBERKELEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k
- EBEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAWone grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
Our team of experienced journalists, with the time and resources to dig deep, is committed to meaningfully informing Californians about the players, politics, and interests that shape the issues that affect their lives.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
How this is measured
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds PRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds Berkeley Community Scholars DBA Berkeley Community Fund ↗
- Who funds DOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds C&O CANAL TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES ↗
- Who funds Positive Communication Practices Inc ↗
- Who funds ELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds Center for Common Ground ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds Infact DBA Corporate Accountability ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds Ashby Village Inc ↗
- Who funds Oakland Elizabeth House ↗
- Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ↗
- Who funds Insight Housing FKA Berkeley Food and Housing Project ↗
- Who funds ONE FAIR WAGE INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds KOVNO COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds Community Water Center ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The California Endowment · Tides Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Cerity Partners Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Jewell Foundation Limited funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jewell Foundation Limited. Bigger dots raise more.
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
- Infact Dba Corporate Accountability: 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jewell Foundation Limited?
Find your warmest path to Jewell Foundation Limited through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Jewell Foundation Limited’s filings →