Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jessie Corson Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$1.5M
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY$60,000
BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$50,000
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH$50,000
HOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY$40,000
WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
ANIMAL FRIENDS INC$20,000
NATIONAL AVIARY$20,000
WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN$15,000
GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY$10,000
ANGEL RIDGE ANIMAL RESCUE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $50k → 10%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 12%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $60k → 14%BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $40k → 10%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $45k → 14%BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $40k → 10%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH: $73k → 11%WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $45k → 14%BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $35k → 10%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH: $51k → 11%WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $18k → 12%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $40k → 14%BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $35k → 10%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%ANGEL RIDGE ANIMAL RESCUE: $11k → 12%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $30k → 14%BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $35k → 10%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%ANGEL RIDGE ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 12%HOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY: $42k → 11%ANGEL RIDGE ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 12%HOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY: $40k → 11%HOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY: $39k → 11%HOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY: $38k → 11%HOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY: $32k → 11%HOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY: $28k → 11%NATIONAL AVIARY: $20k → 11%NATIONAL AVIARY: $20k → 11%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN: $16k → 11%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN: $15k → 11%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN: $15k → 11%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN: $15k → 11%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN: $15k → 11%WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN: $15k → 11%GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY: $10k → 11%GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY: $10k → 11%ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $25k → 11%GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY: $10k → 11%ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $20k → 11%GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY: $10k → 11%ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $20k → 11%GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY: $10k → 11%ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $19k → 11%ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $18k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$1.5M
$6k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $374k · revenue +58%
  • BC
    BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $235k · revenue +63%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $220k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • AF
    ACTION FOR ANIMALS HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bella View Farm Animal Sanctuary Inc
Animals
2
Raskels Rescue
Animals
3
Angel Wing Acres Animal Welfare Soc Lombas
Animals
4
Happy Hen Animal Sanctuary
Animals
5
Martha's Farm Animal Sanctuary
Animals
6
Harvest Home Animal Sanctuary

Farmed animal rescue

Animals
7
Happy Tails Animal Sanctuary
Animals
8
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
9
West Plains Regional Animal Shelter

To Provide a safe place for animals and unite them with permanent homes

Animals
10
Paws Claws Exotics

A sanctuary for unfortunate animals

11
Pinehaven Farm a Sanctuary Inc

Pinehaven Farm is a non-profit sanctuary dedicated to dogs, cats, horses and other animals in need of a permanent home and the prevention of future overpopulation through education programs on spraying and neutering.

Animals
12
Van Wert County Humane Society Inc

The van wert county humane society is committed to building a community of responsible pet owners and ending animal cruelty; to offering a safe haven for animals in need; and to attempt through all reasonable avenues to return animals to…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington Area Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Humane Society of Somerset County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH — $373,589 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGHBEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $235,000 · AnimalsBEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY — $220,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTYHOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY — $219,100 · AnimalsHOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARYAnimal Friends Inc — $101,741 · AnimalsAnimal Friends IncWhite Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter — $91,000 · AnimalsWhite Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill ShelterWASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $83,520 · AnimalsWASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETYGRAY PAWS SANCTUARY — $58,000 · Animals+2 more — $80,800 · Animals+2 moreACTION FOR ANIMALS HUMANE SOCIETY — $5,500 · Other
Animals$1,462,750Other$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH — $373,589 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $235,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY — $220,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetHOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY — $219,100 over 6y, 20% of budgetAnimal Friends Inc — $101,741 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWhite Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter — $91,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $83,520 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGRAY PAWS SANCTUARY — $58,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetAngel Ridge Animal Rescue Inc — $40,800 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY
  • Who funds HOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY
  • Who funds Animal Friends Inc
  • Who funds White Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter
  • Who funds WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY
  • Who funds Angel Ridge Animal Rescue Inc
  • Who funds NATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cigna Group FoundationPA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cigna Group Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Peterson Family Foundation-Tr · Margaret Raphael Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Fred J and Shirley H Jordan Foundation · Edward B Dunlap Jr Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jessie Corson Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph