Skip to content
Jessica's Love Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Jessica's Love Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$153kFood & Nutrition$120kPhilanthropy$115kHuman Services$70kHealth$50kScience & Tech$50k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Regenesis Institute for Regenerative Practice$50,000
Alliance For Local Economic Prosperity$25,000
Santa Fe Community Foundation$15,000
Santa Fe Community Foundation$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%La Cosecha Community Supported Agriculture: $20k → 14%Las Cumbres Community Services Inc: $50k → 18%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
Santa Fe Forest Coalition

Educate the public on forest conservation issues in New Mexico

Environment
3
New Mexico Construction Alliance

As the voice of the building industry, the new mexico construction alliance seeks to support the community and local businesses by providing educational opportunities, advocating for the regulations that benefit a strong housing market,…

—
4
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
5
Protect Tesuque

To protect the air, water and soils of Tesuque Valley and Tesuque Village in New Mexico. The goal is to protect the Little Tesuque River, the Tesuque River and the Historic Village of Tesuque, New Mexico against threats that large-volume…

Environment
6
New Mexico Perinatal Collaborative

The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…

—
7
Center for Social Sustainable Systems

The organization envisions a sustainable, healthy, and thriving community where traditions connected to land and water are protected, preserved, and passed on to future generations. the mission is to protect historical acequias, water, and…

Environment
8
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance

The purpose of the new mexico wilderness alliance is to enjoy, protect, and restore wilderness in new mexico, and to conduct research and educate the public about wilderness in new mexico

Environment
9
Quivira Coalition Inc

Through education, innovation, and collaboration, quivira works in coalition with ranchers, farmers, government agencies, and land stewards to foster resilience on working lands.

Environment
10
Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Water and Rights Inc

Northern new mexicans protecting land water and rights strives to lessen the stress of neighborhood tensions due to lack of information and fair representation. by providing an organization whose main goal is to unite and empower the…

—
11
Nm Comunidades En Accion Y De Fe

CAFE is a faith based Non Profit community organization with the purpose of training and organizing low and moderate income families to shape public policy.

Human Services
12
Taos County Economic Development Corp

The organization was formed in 1987. Its mission is "supporting land, food, water, and the cultures" of the people of northern New Mexico through the design and implementation of community and economic development programs and projects.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Groundworks New Mexico Kristi Dorr; the most unlike its peers is Mendocino Coast Healthcare Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUN…NEW MEXICO FRESH FOODS: $100,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO FRESH FOODSNM IMPACT INVESTMENT COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 · OtherNM IMPACT INVESTMENT C…ALLIANCE FOR LOCAL ECONOMIC PROSPERITY: $90,000 · Arts & CultureALLIANCE FOR LOCAL…LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50,000 · Human ServicesLAS CUMBRES COMMUN…TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $20,000 · Human ServicesTEWA WOMEN UNITEDLA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE: $20,000 · Human ServicesLA COSECHA COMMUNI…REGENESIS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE PRACTICE: $50,000 · EducationREGENESIS INSTIT…GROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR: $30,000 · EducationGROUNDWORKS NEW …Mendocino Coast Healthcare Foundation: $50,000 · HealthMendocino …Partnership for Responsible Business: $22,500 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$115,000Other$110,000Arts & Culture$90,000Human Services$90,000Education$80,000Health$50,000Community Improvement$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR LOCAL ECONOMIC PROSPERITY: $90,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREGENESIS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE PRACTICE: $50,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetMendocino Coast Healthcare Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetGROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR: $30,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetPartnership for Responsible Business: $22,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE: $20,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…New Mexico Community …Marshall L and Perrin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jessica's Love Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jessica's Love Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jessica's Love Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jessica's Love Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jessica's Love’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home