Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jerome & Nancy Kalishman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$998k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$585kAnimals$501kArts & Culture$111kRecreation & Sports$102kEducation$58kReligion$5kHealth$2kCivil Rights$2k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $458k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$74,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS ZOO FOUNDATION$500,000
ST LOUIS KAPLAN FELDMAN HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$100,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION SUSAN K GOLDBERG DAF$74,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$74,500
SCHWAB CHARITABLE JAMES & AMY KALISHMAN FAMILY FUND$74,500
FIDELTIY CHARITABLE JOHN F KALISHMAN CHARITABLE FUND$74,500
CAMP NEBAGAMON$60,000
SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION$11,000
CONGREGATION TEMPLE ISRAEL$3,000
THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES JEWISH$500
CONGREGATION SHAARE EMETH$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 49% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 15%ALLIED SERVICES FOUNDATION: $900 → 13%THE MANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $10k → 22%SCHWAB CHARITABLE JAMES & AMY KALISHMAN FAMILY FUND: $75k → 10%COLEL CHABAD: $1k → 20%CONGREGATION TEMPLE ISRAEL: $3k → 11%SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $25k → 21%CAMP NEBAGAMON: $60k → 11%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $75k → 5%CONGREGATION SHAARE EMETH: $500 → 11%THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $15k → 21%CAMP NEBAGAMON: $20k → 11%NEW MOUNT SINAI CEMETARY: $500 → 11%THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $10k → 21%CAMP NEBAGAMON: $20k → 11%ST LOUIS KAPLAN FELDMAN HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $100k → 11%UNITED WAY: $25k → 21%JEWISH FEDERATION: $54k → 11%UNITED WAY: $6k → 21%JEWISH FEDERATION: $50k → 11%UNITED WAY OF ST LOUIS: $4k → 21%JEWISH FEDERATION: $29k → 11%LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY: $2k → 21%JEWISH FEDERATION: $28k → 11%ST LOUIS ZOO FOUNDATION: $500k → 21%JEWISH FEDERATION: $27k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL: $1k → 21%JEWISH FEDERATION: $27k → 11%ACLU OF MISSOURI: $300 → 21%JEWISH FEDERATION: $25k → 11%THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES JEWISH: $500 → 21%JEWISH FEDERATION: $11k → 11%ST LOUIS KAPLAN FELDMAN HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $1k → 11%BE THE NARRATIVE: $5k → 11%READY READERS: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$534k · 5 repeat orgs$756k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$534k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+66%

Still filing today

60%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $728k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthRecreation & SportsCivil RightsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $252k
  • SL
    St Louis Kaplan Feldman Holocaust Museum
    2× · 2021–2025 · $101k · revenue -86%
  • CN
    CAMP NEBAGAMON
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • MC
    MANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +189%
  • BT
    Be The Narrative formerly Student to Student Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -49%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2021 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
2
The Jewish Publication Society

Our mission has always been to enhance jewish literacy through the publication of great books.

3
St Louis Jewish Light

The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.

4
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
5
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
8
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
9
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
10
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
12
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole and the most unlike its peers is Be the Narrative formerly Student to Student Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST LOUIS ZOO FOUNDATION — $500,000 · OtherST LOUIS ZOO FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION — $252,199 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONSCHWAB CHARITABLE JAMES & AMY KALISHMAN FAMILY FUND — $74,500 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE JAMES & AMY KALISHMAN FAMILY FUNDFIDELTIY CHARITABLE JOHN F KALISHMAN CHARITABLE FUND — $74,500 · OtherFIDELTIY CHARITABLE JOHN F KALISHMAN CHARITABLE FUNDFIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION SUSAN K GOLDBERG DAF — $74,500 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION SUSAN K GOLDBERG DAFTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS — $50,000 · Other+8 more — $40,300 · OtherSt Louis Kaplan Feldman Holocaust Museum — $101,000 · Arts & CultureSt Louis …MANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $10,000 · Arts & CultureMANN CENT…CAMP NEBAGAMON — $100,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $74,500 · PhilanthropyBe The Narrative formerly Student to Student Inc — $5,000 · EducationREADY READERS — $2,500 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL — $1,000 · HealthALLIED SERVICES FOUNDATION — $900 · HealthAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $1,250 · Civil RightsPAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES — $750 · Animals
Other$1,065,999Arts & Culture$111,000Recreation & Sports$101,500Philanthropy$74,500Education$7,500Health$1,900Civil Rights$1,250Animals$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP NEBAGAMON — $100,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS — $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBe The Narrative formerly Student to Student Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetREADY READERS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIED SERVICES FOUNDATION — $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sam and Marilyn Fox FoundationMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jerome & Nancy Kalishman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph