Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jennifer Gordon Polan Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2021 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS$6,000
CITY YEAR DETROIT$6,000
FOCUS HOPE$4,000
WYLIE GROVES HIGH SCHOOL$3,490
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$2,000
CENTER FOR AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH JOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH$2,000
SAY DETROIT$2,000
YAD EZRA$1,000
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD ART CENTER$1,000
ST LEO'S SOUP KITCHEN$1,000
CARE INTERNATIONAL NEW YORK$1,000
STUDENTS AGAINST DESTRUCTIVE DECISIONS$500
THE GREENINGS OF DETROIT$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOCUS HOPE: $4k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

—
3
Arise Detroit

To inspire a community of active engagement, personal responsibility and hope by connecting people to opportunities and resources to transform the quality of life for all Detroiters.

Community Improvement
4
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
5
Urban League of Detroit and Southeastern Michigan

To enable african americans and people in need to reach their full human potential

—
6
Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice

The organization is known as the leader in the movement and is seen as the "go to" experts on environmental justice and sustainable redevelopment because of its knowledge and its network.

Health
7
About Face Detroit
—
8
Detroit Justice Center

The Detroit Justice Center works alongside communities to create economic opportunities, transform the justice system, and promote equitable and just cities.

Crime & Legal
9
Keep Growing Detroit

Keep growing detroit exists to promote a food sovereign city where the majority of fruits and vegetables detroiters consume are grown by residents within the city's limits.

Community Improvement
10
Good Jobs Now Inc

To build the political and economic power of low and moderate-income detroiters of color through neighborhood-driven community organizing and civic engagement in order to change public policy and communities for the better.

—
11
Greater Lansing Food Bank

Partner to alleviate hunger one meal at a time, to create a future where everyone has access to nourishing food.

Food & Nutrition
12
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alternatives for Girls; the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY YEAR INC: $6,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCWYLIE GROVES HIGH SCHOOL: $3,490 · OtherWYLIE GROVES HIGH SCHOOLCENTER FOR AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH JOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $2,000 · OtherCENTER FOR AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH JOHNS HOPKINS SCHO…CARE INTERNATIONAL NEW YORK: $1,000 · OtherCARE INTERNATIONAL NEW YORKYAD EZRA: $1,000 · OtherYAD EZRASTUDENTS AGAINST DESTRUCTIVE DECISIONS: $500 · OtherALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLSSAY DETROIT: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterSAY DETROITFOCUSHOPE: $4,000 · Human ServicesFOCUSHOPEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · InternationalST LEOS SOUP KITCHEN: $1,000 · Food & NutritionBirmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GREENING OF DETROIT: $500 · Environment
Other$13,990Housing & Shelter$8,000Human Services$4,000International$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY YEAR INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUSHOPE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAY DETROIT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LEOS SOUP KITCHEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBirmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREENING OF DETROIT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI14× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jennifer Gordon Polan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jennifer Gordon Polan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jennifer Gordon Polan’s filings →

More from the funding graph