· Private foundation
Jennie K Scaife Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of JENNIE K SCAIFE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k11 grants · $236k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+7 grants · $3.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK | $500,000 |
| ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK | $500,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN IN RECOVERY | $500,000 |
| ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK | $500,000 |
| CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER | $431,078 |
| HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE | $350,000 |
| UNICEF USA | $300,000 |
| CRISIS CENTER NORTH INC | $234,500 |
| WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH | $225,000 |
| CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER | $208,491 |
| ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK | $198,438 |
| CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER | $110,431 |
| ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK | $103,137 |
| REBEL RECOVERY FLORIDA | $100,000 |
| CRISIS CENTER NORTH INC | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- POPENNSYLVANIA ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN IN EARLY RECOVERY4× · 2021–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +48%
- HAHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE3× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +9%
- CCCRISIS CENTER NORTH INC5× · 2020–2024 · $875k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI LEONARD M MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINEone grant, 2022 · $1.3M
University of South Florida Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +174%- NRNORTHEND RISE INCone grant, 2023 · $85k · revenue +25% · 26% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…
Since 1981, children's advocacy center of southwest florida, inc. (cac) has advocated for a healthy, safe community for children through a multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. our mission is to create a safe and…
Children's home society of florida mission statement:building bridges to success for children
Preventing child abuse, restoring healing, and strengthening all children and their families through advocacy, treatment, and shelter.
Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.
The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…
For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…
Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.
Our mission is to prevent child abuse and to aid child abuse victims and families by providing coordinated services in a safe, child-friendly environment from report and investigation through treatment and resolution.
Providing home, hope and healing to abused and neglected children and teens in southwest florida.
To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.
Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Speak Up for Kids of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Little Smiles Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Crime Victims Treatment Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN IN EARLY RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CENTER NORTH INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds Urban Youth Impact Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA of Allegheny County ↗
- Who funds Rebel Recovery Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Housing Partnership Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHEND RISE INC ↗
- Who funds Little Smiles Inc ↗
- Who funds SPEAK UP FOR KIDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CLOTHES TO KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds CROSSWINDS YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FEED THE HUNGRY PANTRY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SIMPLY GRACE ↗
- Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN COURT OF SARASOTA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wi Patterson Charitable Fund · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Quantum Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jennie K Scaife Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Action Stops Abuse Inc — 13% of income from government
- Rebel Recovery Florida Inc — 8% of income from government
- Crosswinds Youth Services Inc — 7% of income from government
- Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Teen Court of Sarasota Inc — 0% of income from government
- Housing Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jennie K Scaife Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Jennie K Scaife Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.