Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jenkins Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$1.1MHuman Services$985kHousing & Shelter$695kAnimals$337kFood & Nutrition$250kYouth Development$238kEducation$140kEnvironment$95kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $512k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $703k
  • $250k+1 grant · $600k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPRESSION CENTER$600,000
EMU FOUNDATION$101,500
PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$100,000
SAFEHOUSE CENTER$100,000
SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY$75,000
AVALON HOUSING$75,000
VISTA MARIA$75,000
FOOD GATHERERS$75,000
NEUTRAL ZONE$51,000
OZONE HOUSE$50,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN$42,132
MICHIGAN FOSTER CARE CLOSET$40,000
CORNER HEALTH CENTER$40,000
DAWN FARM$40,000
COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $740k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALPHA HOUSE: $25k → 18%TRUE NORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 13%HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK: $50k → 21%TRUE NORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 13%HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK: $20k → 21%HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK: $10k → 21%OZONE HOUSE: $8k → 14%THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $25k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $25k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $25k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $5k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $50k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $35k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $25k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $25k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $15k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $100k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $100k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $50k → 14%OUR HOUSE: $25k → 14%OUR HOUSE: $25k → 14%OUR HOUSE: $25k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 28 repeat orgs$304k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
12

Total granted

$3.7M
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+29%

Still filing today

79%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PN
    Peace Neighborhood Center
    4× · 2021–2024 · $265k · revenue +16%
  • SA
    SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $248k · revenue +147%
  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $240k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • DC
    DEXTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • MP
    MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +74%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -92%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
2
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
3
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services
4
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
5
Washtenaw Housing Alliance

The mission of the washtenaw housing alliance is to end homelessness in our community.

Housing & Shelter
6
United Way of Marquette County

Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…

—
7
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
8
Michigan Advocacy Program

To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.

Crime & Legal
9
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
10
Harm Reduction Michigan

The mission of harm reduction is to reduce substance abuse and related activities in a respectful manner in collaboration with the user

Health
11
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
12
Michigan State Afl-Cio Workforce Development Institute

To apply the principles of workforce development to grow michigan's economy while improving the lives of michigan workers.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ozone House Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Educational Foundation of Dexte. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPRESSION CENTER: $650,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPRESSION CENTEREMU FOUNDATION: $336,500 · OtherEMU FOUNDATIONFOOD GATHERERS: $240,000 · OtherFOOD GATHERERSVISTA MARIA: $215,000 · OtherVISTA MARIASAFEHOUSE CENTER: $160,000 · OtherSAFEHOUSE CENTERAVALON HOUSING: $110,000 · OtherCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $105,000 · OtherDEXTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $100,000 · Other+16 more: $282,600 · Other+16 morePeace Neighborhood Center: $265,000 · Human ServicesPeace Neighborhood CenterOZONE HOUSE INC: $122,500 · Human ServicesOZONE HOUSE INCMICHIGAN FOSTER CARE CLOSET: $105,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN FOSTER CARE CLOSE…COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $90,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORKHomeless Action Network of Detroit: $80,000 · Human ServicesHomeless Action Network of…SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $75,000 · Human ServicesSOS COMMUNITY SERVICESOUR HOUSE: $75,000 · Human ServicesOUR HOUSEFAITH IN ACTION INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesFAITH IN ACTION INC+3 more: $67,500 · Human Services+3 moreSHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $247,600 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterGIRLS GROUP: $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $67,132 · Youth DevelopmentNeutral Zone: $66,000 · Youth DevelopmentDawn Incorporated: $105,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $75,000 · HealthMICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $95,000 · EnvironmentAnn Arbor Spark Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS: $6,100 · PhilanthropyPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGREAT LAKES REGIONAL FIELD HOCKEY: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,199,100Human Services$935,000Housing & Shelter$297,600Youth Development$238,132Health$200,000Environment$95,000Philanthropy$21,100Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPeace Neighborhood Center: $265,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetSHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $247,600 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $240,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $215,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOZONE HOUSE INC: $122,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetGIRLS GROUP: $105,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetDawn Incorporated: $105,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $105,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMICHIGAN FOSTER CARE CLOSET: $105,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $90,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetHomeless Action Network of Detroit: $80,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOUR HOUSE: $75,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $67,132 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNeutral Zone: $66,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $50,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF DEXTE: $40,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetAlpha House A Place for New Beginnings: $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTRUENORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA Brighter Way: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFriends In Deed: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAnn Arbor Spark Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGREAT LAKES REGIONAL FIELD HOCKEY: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCOUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS: $6,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Peace Neighborhood Center ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
  • Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Dawn Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds CORNER HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN FOSTER CARE CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Action Network of Detroit ↗
  • Who funds SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Neutral Zone ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF DEXTE ↗
  • Who funds Alpha House A Place for New Beginnings ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUENORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds A Brighter Way ↗
  • Who funds Friends In Deed ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI40.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · Thrift Shop Association of Ann Arbor · DTE Energy Foundation · Kiwanis Club of Ann Arbor Foundation Inc · Speckhard-Knight Charitable Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Edward F Redies Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jenkins Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jenkins Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jenkins Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jenkins Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jenkins’ filings →

    More from the funding graph