Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jeffery and Patricia Davis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2026still arriving
9
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$156kHuman Services$108kHealth$84kRecreation & Sports$48kCrime & Legal$43kInternational$38kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCC FOUNDATION$25,000
EDUCATION SUCCESS FOUNDATION$20,000
SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILDHOOD$20,000
OAK HILL FOUNDATION$10,000
MARY CARIOLA CENTER$10,000
THE LOBDELL CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH & WELLNESS$5,000
PLUTA CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
VETERANS OUTREACH CENTER$5,000
CANANDAIGUA LAKE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MCC FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%MCC FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $1k → 14%WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$577k · 18 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$577k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+48%

Still filing today

56%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILDHOOD I
    10× · 2017–2026 · $93k · revenue +109%
  • ES
    EDUCATION SUCCESS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $92k · revenue +76%
  • Veterans Outreach Center Inc
    10× · 2017–2026 · $48k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • AH
    ADVENT HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • MF
    MIRACLE FIELD OF GREATER ROCHESTER
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • TM
    TRINITY MONTESSORI SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rochester Child Care Center Inc

The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…

Human Services
2
The Childrens Center for Neurodevelopmental Studies Inc

To assist the development of autistic and other neurodevelopmentally delayed children toward a happy and productive future where their maximum potential can be realized.

—
3
The Montessori School of Rochester

To nourish the child's spirit, while fostering exploration, independence, and confidence. we strive to inspire a lifelong love of learning, while modeling grace, courtesy, and respect for self, others, and the earth.

—
4
Suny Cortland Child Care Center Inc

The suny cortland child care center is dedicated to providing affordable child care for the children of the college's employees and students, which meets the highest nationally recognized standards. qualified staff provide an educational…

Human Services
5
Nyc Autism Charter Schools

The mission of nyc autism charter schools is to provide individualized, scientifically based educational services to children with autism and other pervasive development disorders.

Education
6
Mount Kisco Child Care Center

To help working families thrive by providing equitable access to high-quality child care and early education to a diverse group of children through innovative, developmentally appropriate programming and a holistic approach to supporting…

Human Services
7
Mid-Hudson Valley Early Education Center

Develop, maintain, and advance programs to empower children to learn and grow through a variety of learning opportunities and experiences.

Education
8
Community Child Care Center of the Third Ward Inc

Provide a safe, caring, and dynamic environment to help nurture the development of pre-school aged children.

Human Services
9
Child Development Center Inc

The Child Development Center is a developmental day center designed to build the independence of exceptional children through high-quality early education and therapeutic services. It serves special needs children ages 2 to 5 from New…

Education
10
Central New York Quest Inc

Central ny quest has been established to serve the needs of persons with intellectual, developmental and mental health disorders in the central new york region.

Human Services
11
Center for Spectrum Services

Our mission is to evaluate individual needs, develop nurturing, therapeutic learning environments and foster professional growth. we believe that family, staff and community collaboration is the cornerstone of our success.

—
12
Chemung Valley Montessori School

Embracing the montessori philosophy, we nurture each child's individual potential, passion for lifelong learning and sense of world community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rochester School of the Holy Childhood I; the most unlike its peers is Canandaigua Lake Watershed Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $59,250 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEVeterans Outreach Center Inc: $48,000 · OtherVeterans Outreach Center IncNATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING EXPLOIT: $38,000 · OtherNATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING EXPLOITMARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $30,000 · OtherMARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INCGILDAS CLUB: $24,000 · OtherGILDAS CLUBGOLISANO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $18,000 · OtherGOLISANO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALPLUTA CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherNATIVITY PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $28,500 · Other+7 moreROCHESTER SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILDHOOD I: $93,087 · EducationROCHESTER SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILDH…EDUCATION SUCCESS FOUNDATION INC: $92,000 · EducationEDUCATION SUCCESS FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $43,000 · Crime & LegalMCC FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesWILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesEQUICENTER INC: $25,000 · HealthCancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester: $8,000 · HealthOAK HILL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$265,750Education$186,087Crime & Legal$43,000Human Services$35,000Health$33,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCHESTER SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILDHOOD I: $93,087 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATION SUCCESS FOUNDATION INC: $92,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVeterans Outreach Center Inc: $48,000 over 10y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $43,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUICENTER INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester: $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILDHOOD I ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION SUCCESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Outreach Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds MCC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OAK HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUICENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Canandaigua Lake Watershed Association ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes IncNY24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Ames-Amzalak Memorial Trust · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Charles J & Burton S August Family Foundation · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc · The Florence M Muller Foundation · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeffery and Patricia Davis Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeffery and Patricia Davis Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeffery and Patricia Davis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph