Skip to content
Jeff C Kwok and Gladys W Kwok Family Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

Jeff C Kwok and Gladys W Kwok Family Foundation

To act as a supporting organization under irs sec.

$297k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.0MInternational$1.4M
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $254k
$54,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL$199,500
LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI$54,000
LOGOS BAPTIST CHURCH$36,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 71% of grant dollars ($2.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 29% that went abroad ($984k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHINA EVANGELICAL SEMINARY: $50k → 8%LOGOS BAPTIST CHURCH: $36k → 8%GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $30k → 10%IMPRINT CHURCH: $81k → 10%CHINA EVANGELICAL SEMINARY NA: $15k → 14%SYRACUSE CHINESE CHURCH: $10k → 14%LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI: $58k → 6%PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $315k → 12%CHINA EVANGELICAL SEMINARY: $30k → 8%CROSS ROAD PUBLICATION: $20k → 8%GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $20k → 10%IMPRINT CHURCH: $44k → 10%LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI: $54k → 6%PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $273k → 12%CHINA EVANGELICAL SEMINARY: $30k → 8%LOGOS BAPTIST CHURCH: $10k → 8%GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $20k → 10%IMPRINT CHURCH: $40k → 10%LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI: $54k → 6%PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $210k → 12%SACRED LOGOS RESOURCE CENTER: $40k → 8%IMPRINT CHURCH: $27k → 10%LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI: $54k → 6%PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $205k → 12%CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP INSTITUT: $15k → 8%LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI: $52k → 6%PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $150k → 12%SACRED LOGOS RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 8%LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI: $50k → 6%LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI: $50k → 6%LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI: $50k → 6%LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATI: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 29% of all-years giving ($984k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Singapore$984k · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 9 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$3.3M
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+13%

Still filing today

33%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M
  • C
    CNEC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $984k
  • LL
    LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $431k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • CI
    CHINESE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -53%
  • IC
    IMPRINT CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $27k
  • CP
    CROSSROADS PUBLICATIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +133%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Systematic Asian Leadership Trainin

Religious training: to assist the church in asia by training its leaders and equipping them to train others.

Religion
2
China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

—
3
Sagos Institute of Preaching and Bible Exposition

The mission of our school can be divided into 4 areas:1.To cultivate students exegesis & preaching of the Scriptures rightly based on truth found in Bible. 2.To edify Bible study talents to teach Bible and lead Bible study as the focus of…

Education
4
China Evangelistic Mission Inc

China Christian Evangelic mission development

Religion
5
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
6
Silk Wave Mission

SWM Mission is an abbreviation for Silk Wave Mission, and is an organization that serves as a united prayer movement, church planting movement, and missionary church movement for spiritual recovery and revival in Turkey and the Islamic…

Religion
7
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
8
Vision for Asia

Christian Ministry Activities

Religion
9
Logos Taiwan

The specific purpose of this corporation is tosupport, train & develop pastors, ministers, and church leaders for the Evangelical Formosan Church and other Christian denominations.

Religion
10
Chinese Christian Fellowship Intl

It is ccf's objective to establish training centers in communities all over the world teaching biblical truth to produce in all who are called to be leaders and participants lives in christ's fullness: 1. study god's word with life…

Religion
11
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
12
Europe Campus Ministry

The Organization is formed for Christian evangelism and discipleship training as afundamentalist, evangelical, and non-denominational faith-based missionorganization. Its mission is to reach out to students with the whole of gospel ofJesus…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese International Missions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lexington Leadership Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,352,000 · OtherPARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INCCNEC: $983,565 · OtherCNECIMPRINT CHURCH OF FREMONT: $165,000 · OtherIMPRINT CHURCH OF FREMONT+6 more: $215,500 · Other+6 moreLEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $431,000 · Arts & CultureLEXINGTON LEAD…CHINA EVANGELICAL SEMINARY ASSOCIATION INC: $110,000 · EducationSACRED LOGOS RESOURCE CENTER SAGOS: $55,000 · EducationCHINESE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC: $30,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $15,000 · ReligionCHINA EVANGELICAL SEMINARY NORTH AMERICA: $15,000 · ReligionUSA CARE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · Religion
Other$2,716,065Arts & Culture$431,000Education$165,000Religion$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $431,000 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetSACRED LOGOS RESOURCE CENTER SAGOS: $55,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCHINESE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetCROSSROADS PUBLICATIONS: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCHINA EVANGELICAL SEMINARY NORTH AMERICA: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUSA CARE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINA EVANGELICAL SEMINARY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRED LOGOS RESOURCE CENTER SAGOS ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS PUBLICATIONS ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHINA EVANGELICAL SEMINARY NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds USA CARE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeff C Kwok and Gladys W Kwok Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeff C Kwok and Gladys W Kwok Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jeff C Kwok and Gladys W Kwok Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jeff C Kwok and Gladys W Kwok Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeff C Kwok and Gladys W Kwok Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home