Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jeannine y Francis Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$182k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$676kEnvironment$258kHealth$182kYouth Development$138kArts & Culture$124kReligion$55kInternational$43kHuman Services$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $151k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BIG GREEN FOUNDATION$30,000
JOHN W HEREFORD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$22,500
DAVIS-STUART INC$21,000
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$20,000
GREENBRIER VALLEY THEATRE$20,000
SOUTHERN WV COMMUNITY COLLEGE$15,000
ABLE FAMILIES INC$12,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE$7,500
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY$5,000
OLD STONE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
HIGHLAWN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,000
BIG BROTHERSSISTERS OF THE TRI-ST$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 22%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 22%GOLDEN GIRL GROUP HOME: $5k → 18%GOLDEN GIRL GROUP HOME: $3k → 18%GOLDEN GIRL GROUP HOME: $1k → 18%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 19%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 19%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 26 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
10

Total granted

$1.6M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+31%

Still filing today

38%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $490k · revenue +427%
  • GR
    GREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $113k · revenue +6%
  • AF
    ABLE FAMILIES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $43k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • SW
    SOUTHERN WV COMMUNITIY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • FH
    FACING HUNGER FOODBANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +31%
  • BT
    BENJAMIN THE BRAVE CANCER FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Just for Kids Inc

Create a safe environment for children by preventing and responding to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
2
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
3
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal
4
Mountain State Justice Inc

Mountain state justice provides free legal services to low income people in west virginia and assures that low income people have access to the court system.

Crime & Legal
5
Family Service of Marion & Harrison Counties Inc

To provide personal care and counseling services for the development of wholesome family life

Human Services
6
Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
7
Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter
8
For Children's Sake of Virginia Inc

For children's sake is dedicated to promoting positive environments for children and families that develop trust, stability and independence.

Human Services
9
Wetzel-Tyler Child Advocacy Center

To reduce the traumatic effects of abuse, protect children from maltreatment, seek justice for child victims, investigate abuse and strengthen the communitys awareness.

Human Services
10
Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

To serve the needs of individuals suffering from life-limiting illness as well as to serve the individuals caring for them. to place emphasis on comfort and quality of life while fulfilling the physical, psychological, social and spiritual…

—
11
Virginia Home for Boys and Girls Foundation

Exclusively supports the charitable and educational purposes of the virginia home for boys and girls.

Youth Development
12
Philanthropy West Virginia Inc

Strengthening philanthropy in the mountain state.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Davis-Stuart Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lewisburg Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BIG GREEN FOUNDATION: $266,350 · OtherTHE BIG GREEN FOUNDATIONJOHN W HEREFORD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $129,500 · OtherJOHN W HEREFORD BOYS & GIRLS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $78,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHERN WV COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $74,000 · OtherSOUTHERN WV COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLEABLE FAMILIES INC: $42,500 · OtherHIGHLAWN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $27,030 · Other+21 more: $122,700 · Other+21 moreMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $490,000 · EducationMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCO…THE DAVID SCHOOL INC: $21,500 · EducationDAVIS-STUART INC: $129,500 · HealthDAVIS-STUART…CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · HealthCABELL HUNTI…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY: $112,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN GIRL INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesDRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES INC: $1,000 · EmploymentFRIENDS OF BLUESTONE INC: $1,000 · Religion
Other$800,080Education$511,500Health$174,500Arts & Culture$115,500Human Services$24,500Employment$1,000Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $490,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetDAVIS-STUART INC: $129,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY: $112,500 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetABLE FAMILIES INC: $42,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE DAVID SCHOOL INC: $21,500 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN GIRL INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLILY'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc: $3,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKEITH ALBEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF BLUESTONE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLewisburg Foundation Incorporated: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS-STUART INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds ABLE FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GIRL INC ↗
  • Who funds FACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds LILY'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc ↗
  • Who funds KEITH ALBEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES W CAMMACK CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BLUESTONE INC ↗
  • Who funds Lewisburg Foundation Incorporated ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Encova Foundation of West VirginiaWV22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Encova Foundation of West Virginia · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Peoples Bank Foundation · Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Highmark Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Brown Dog Yoga Foundation · Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc · The Huntington Foundation Inc · United Way of the River Cities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeannine y Francis Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeannine y Francis Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jeannine y Francis Charitable Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Jeannine y Francis Charitable Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeannine y Francis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph