· Private foundation
Jaymar Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARKS COLORECTAL SURGICAL FOUNDATION | $33,500 |
| EPIPHANY OF OUR LORD | $25,000 |
| HOLY SAVIOUR CHURCH | $10,000 |
| GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP | $5,000 |
| CAMPHILL SOLTANE | $5,000 |
| MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY | $5,000 |
| PILLARS OF LIGHT AND LOVE | $5,000 |
| WISSAHICKON FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| GEMMA SERVICES (FORMERLY SILVER SPRINGS-MARTIN LUTHER SCHOOL) | $2,500 |
| ANGEL FLIGHT EAST | $2,500 |
| A BABY'S BREATH | $2,000 |
| MORRIS ANIMAL REFUGE | $2,000 |
| THE BROTHER HOUSE- LEGION OF MARY | $2,000 |
| CASA YOUTH ADVOCATES INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
41 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GHGATEWAY HOUSING GROUP9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +163%
- GSGemma Services9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +101%
- NZNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY6× · 2019–2024 · $31k · revenue +141%
Funded once
- AEALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORKone grant, 2020 · $9k
- EHEINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORKone grant, 2017 · $5k
- LSLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIAone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families by providing accessible, creative, and high quality legal assistance and working collaboratively for systemic change.
Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
To gentle the journey through serious illness and loss with skill and compassion. to bring comfort by providing compassionate, professional care to community residents who are facing serious illness and loss. to provide dignity for the…
Beyond celiac unites with patients and partners to drive diagnosis, advance research, and accelerate the discovery of new treatments and a cure.
The children's advocacy center of northeastern pennsylvania is a private, non-profit, charitable organization whose mission is to provide excellence in the assessment and treatment of child abuse and neglect.
Pca promotes healing and justice for sexually abused children in philadelphia. using a multidisciplinary approach, we collaborate with our partners in child protection, law enforcement, and medical and mental health services to provide…
Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.
Early education and child care services
Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.
Ending animal homelessness through adoptions, education and outreach while saving lives and supporting the bond between pets and their families.
Civil justice for those in need, their homes secured, families protected, and finances fortified.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Loss and Bereavement and the most unlike its peers is Pooch Kaboose Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARKS COLORECTAL SURGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP ↗
- Who funds Gemma Services ↗
- Who funds NORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR LOSS AND BEREAVEMENT ↗
- Who funds LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MORRIS ANIMAL REFUGE ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT EAST ↗
- Who funds PILLARS OF LIGHT AND LOVE ↗
- Who funds A Babys Breath ↗
- Who funds Cradle of Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION ↗
- Who funds LISAS ARMY INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds CAMPHILL SOLTANE ↗
- Who funds Montgomery County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
- Who funds THE GLADWYNE MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MATTIE N DIXON COMMUNITY CUPBOARD INC ↗
- Who funds CECIL AND GRACE BEANS SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Little Tower Foundation · Genuardi Family Foundation · Montgomery County Foundation Inc · The Cigna Group Foundation · Suburban Development Council Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Wsfs Cares Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Chubb Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jaymar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jaymar Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jaymar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.