Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jay Sample Thompson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$72kAnimals$63kFood & Nutrition$13kCommunity Improvement$10kArts & Culture$3k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$14,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$399k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PA CLEANWAYS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY$14,500
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY$4,264
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSN INC: $8k → 10%SOUTH HILLS PET RESCUE: $19k → 10%PITTSBURGH BOTANIC GARDEN: $3k → 11%Washington Area Humane Society: $10k → 12%INDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $7k → 14%Grow Pittsburgh: $13k → 11%ALLEGHENY LAND TRUST: $9k → 11%ALLEGHENY LAND TRUST: $6k → 11%TRASH CAT RESCUE INC: $10k → 11%TRASH CAT RESCUE INC: $5k → 11%PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCAST: $3k → 11%NATIONAL AVIARY: $12k → 11%WESTERN PA CONSERVANCY: $16k → 11%UPSTREAM PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $4k → 11%PA CLEANWAYS OF ALLEGHENY CLEANWAYS INC: $10k → 11%PA CLEANWAYS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy

We improve quality of life by enhancing and stewarding pittsburgh's parks in partnership with the community.

Recreation & Sports
2
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
3
Scenic Pittsburgh

To protect, preserve, and promote the scenic resources of southwestern pennsylvania.

Environment
4
Animal Welfare Council of the Alleghenie Dba Allegheny Spay and Neuter Clinic

The Animal Welfare Council of Alleghenies (AWC) is composed of individuals of diverse interest who intersect at their concern for the health and welfare of animals. The AWC is a clearinghouse of information and ideas, promotes…

Animals
5
Allegheny County Conservation District

The Allegheny County Conservation District is an urban conservation district that engages and leads through partnerships, innovation, and implementation to conserve, promote, and improve Allegheny Countys natural resources.

Environment
6
The Clearwater Conservancy of Central Pennsylvania Inc

To conserve and restore the natural resources through land conservation, water resources stewardship and environmental outreach across central pennsylvania.

Environment
7
Westmoreland Conservancy

The westmoreland conservancy is an accredited non-profit land trust located in murrysville about 20 miles east of pittsburgh in westmoreland county. the organization was founded in 1991, and has always been run by community volunteers. the…

Environment
8
Independence Conservancyinc

Preserving open space by acquisition, easement or deed restriction to protect wildlife habitat, natural and cultural resources, scenic views and quality of life; providing stewardship of watersheds in southwestern pennsylvania through…

Environment
9
Humane Animal Rescue

We strive to provide all aspects of care to abandoned, neglected, and injured animals; reunite lost pets with their caregivers or seek new families for them; educate the community on humane care and interactions with all animals with the…

Animals
10
Great Allegheny Passage Conservancy

Founded in 1995 to coordinate the completion of the great allegheny passage, a 150-mile non-motorized path connecting pittsburgh and cumberland, maryland, the great allegheny passage conservancy promotes the great allegheny passage and…

Environment
11
Humane Action Pittsburgh

To advocate for all animals; to provide education and information to empower its membership and allies; to sponsor, host and / or participate in events and activities that promote animal welfare or protection; to develop relationships…

Animals
12
Westmoreland Land Trust

To conserve and steward lands and waters of Westmoreland County that harbor ecological, cultural or recreational qualities to offer a healthier and more sustainable future for all.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pa Cleanways of Allegheny County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Trash Cat Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTH HILLS PET RESCUE — $18,570 · OtherSOUTH HILLS PET RESCUEWESTERN PA CONSERVANCY — $16,175 · OtherWESTERN PA CONSERVANCYPA CLEANWAYS OF ALLEGHENY CLEANWAYS INC — $10,000 · OtherPA CLEANWAYS OF ALLEGHENY CLEANWAYS IN…Individual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRASH CAT RESCUE INC — $15,000 · AnimalsTRASH CAT RESCUE INCNATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC — $12,276 · AnimalsNATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH I…WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 · AnimalsWASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETYINDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $7,223 · AnimalsINDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYALLEGHENY LAND TRUST — $15,138 · EnvironmentALLEGHENY LAND TRUSTPA CLEANWAYS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY INC — $14,500 · EnvironmentPA CLEANWAYS OF ALLEGHENY COUN…LOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC — $8,493 · EnvironmentLOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOCIATI…WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY — $4,264 · EnvironmentWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVAN…GROW PITTSBURGH — $12,500 · Food & NutritionPittsburgh Botanic Garden — $2,935 · Youth DevelopmentPITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION — $2,600 · Arts & Culture
Other$54,745Animals$44,499Environment$42,395Food & Nutrition$12,500Youth Development$2,935Arts & Culture$2,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALLEGHENY LAND TRUST — $15,138 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTRASH CAT RESCUE INC — $15,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetGROW PITTSBURGH — $12,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC — $12,276 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC — $8,493 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $7,223 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPittsburgh Botanic Garden — $2,935 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION — $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard King Mellon FoundationPA21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Eqt Foundation · C F Holdship Charitable Trust · The Grable Foundation · Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds · Equitrans Midstream Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Clark Hunter Foundation · Brooks Foundation · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jay Sample Thompson Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph