Skip to content

· Private foundation

Javitch Karen Sokolof Chart Fnd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$244kYouth Development$141kPhilanthropy$115kHealth$110kReligion$33kCivil Rights$11kEducation$10kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$695k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA FOUNDATION FOR VISUALLY$30,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NEBRASKA INC$10,000
BOLDY INSPIRING GREATNESS$3,000
WYNHOO-NOW INC$2,500
OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$1,000
PHOENIX ACADEMY DAY SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WYNHOO-NOW INC: $3k → 11%WYNHOO-NOW INC: $3k → 11%HEART HEROES INC: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
DE
TN
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$501k · 16 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
27

Total granted

$501k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+37%

Still filing today

38%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEmploymentHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +29%
  • WI
    WNYHOO-NOW INC D/B/A PAUSE FOR INSPIRATION
    2× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +42%
  • PV
    PRODIGY VENTURES INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • WC
    WAUSAU COMMUNITY THEATRE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • PA
    PARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Opera Omaha Inc

Enriching the quality of life in the community by creating professional opera and music theater, which uniquely combine the visual and performing arts to express humanity's deepest emotions and highest aspirations.

Arts & Culture
2
Omaha Theater Company

To inspire young people and their families to discover the magic of theater, find their voices, and enrich their communities. theater is utilized as a tool in the educational and social development of young people to provide formal…

Arts & Culture
3
Phamaly Theatre Company

Phamaly theatre company's mission is to be a creative home for theatre artists with disabilities; to model a disability-affirmative theatrical process; and to upend conventional narratives by transforming individuals, audiences, and the…

Arts & Culture
4
Oklahoma Repertory Theatre Group Inc

Okc rep produces live theater that builds community, creates conversation, and inspires us all.

Arts & Culture
5
Des Moines Performing Arts

Engage the midwest in meaningful entertainment, education, and cultural activities. provide performing arts experiences that educate, inspire and challenge.

Community Improvement
6
Broadway Dallas Inc

To educate the public in music appreciation and fine arts, including the presentation of musical theater and other shows with educational value.

Arts & Culture
7
Curious Theatre Company

Curious theatre company is a mid-sized professional theatre located in denver's golden triangle neighborhood. the theatre typically produces five main-stage productions per season and hosts many events and programs such as curious new…

Arts & Culture
8
Pittsburgh Public Theater Corporation

The mission of pittsburgh public theater is to provide artistically diverse theatrical experiences of the highest quality. pittsburgh public theater also strives to serve, challenge, stimulate, and (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
9
Quantum Theatre Inc

Quantum theatre is a company of progressive, professional artists dedicated to producing intimate and sophisticated theatrical experiences in uncommon settings, exploring universal themes of truth, beauty, and human relationships in…

Arts & Culture
10
Minnesota Fringe Festival

Minnesota fringe connects adventurous artists with adventurous audiences by creating open, supportive forums for free and diverse artistic expression.

Arts & Culture
11
The Community Theatre of Cedar Rapids Inc

Theatre cedar rapids strives to captivate and inspire through the theatrical and performing arts. tcr's vision is to be a cultural point of pride, connection, inclusion, and learning, invigorating growth in the community.

Arts & Culture
12
Children's Theater of Madison Inc

To spark imagination and build community through the creation and experience of theater.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clarion Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Concerned Nebraskans for Cystic Fibrosis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLESTON PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $130,000 · OtherCHARLESTON PERFORMING ARTS CENTERNEBRASKA FOUNDATION FOR VISUALLY: $105,000 · OtherNEBRASKA FOUNDATION FOR VISUALLYNEBRASKA FOUNDATION FOR: $30,000 · OtherNEBRASKA FOUNDATION FORCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NEBRASKA INC: $13,000 · Other+30 more: $100,323 · Other+30 moreHANG ON TO THE DREAM FOUNDATION: $137,000 · Youth DevelopmentHANG ON TO THE DREAM FO…+1 more: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $80,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERA…ONE FOR ALL MUSICAL THEATER: $36,000 · Arts & CultureONE FOR A…OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureOMAHA CON…Downriver Actors Guild: $7,000 · Arts & CultureDownriver…(402) ARTS COLLECTIVE: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureB'NAI B'RITH HENRY MONSKY LODGE: $10,494 · Civil RightsWNYHOO-NOW INC D/B/A PAUSE FOR INSPIRATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesHEART HEROES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC: $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$378,323Youth Development$139,000Philanthropy$80,500Arts & Culture$58,000Civil Rights$10,494Human Services$6,000Recreation & Sports$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHANG ON TO THE DREAM FOUNDATION: $137,000 over 5y, 76% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $80,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetONE FOR ALL MUSICAL THEATER: $36,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDownriver Actors Guild: $7,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWNYHOO-NOW INC D/B/A PAUSE FOR INSPIRATION: $5,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget(402) ARTS COLLECTIVE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRODIGY VENTURES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLERGY SAFE KIDS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART HEROES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONCERNED NEBRASKANS FOR CYSTIC FIBROSIS: $1,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetPHOENIX ACADEMY DAY SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCLARION PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HANG ON TO THE DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE FOR ALL MUSICAL THEATER ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH HENRY MONSKY LODGE ↗
  • Who funds PARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Downriver Actors Guild ↗
  • Who funds WNYHOO-NOW INC D/B/A PAUSE FOR INSPIRATION ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds (402) ARTS COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRODIGY VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLERGY SAFE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HEART HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCERNED NEBRASKANS FOR CYSTIC FIBROSIS ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX ACADEMY DAY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · Phillip and Terri Schrager Foundation · Harley and Beth Schrager Foundation · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Shirley and Leonard Goldstein Supporting Foundation · Ike & Roz Friedman Foundation · The Giving 3 Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Albert and Eleanor Feldman Family Israel Foundation · Martha and David Slosburg Family Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Javitch Karen Sokolof Chart Fnd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Javitch Karen Sokolof Chart Fnd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Tampa Jccfederation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Cast Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Javitch Karen Sokolof Chart Fnd’s filings →

More from the funding graph