Skip to content
Jason Taylor Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Jason Taylor Foundation Inc

Raise funds for childrens programs the foundation supports and creates programs that facilitate the personal growth and empowerment of south floridas children

$255k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$402kEducation$87kYouth Development$46kAnimals$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $65,742, the rows itemized in this filing. The $255,200 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $189,458 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$159k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIDES$25,742
Jackson Memorial Foundation$20,000
Dolphins Cancer Challenge$10,000
Udonis Haslem Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 45% of Jason Taylor Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 54%.

Jason Taylor Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$434k · 5 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +222% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$434k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+222%
0%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +272%
  • SI
    SYDNEY'S INCREDIBLE DEFEAT OF EWING'S SARCOMA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $137k · revenue +222% · 60% of their budget
  • YA
    YOUTH AUTOMOTIVE TRAINING CENTER OF BROWARD
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • PC
    PARKLAND CARES INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $45k · revenue -86%
  • JD
    JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • TD
    THE DAN MARINO FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami
—
2
The Miami Girls Foundation Inc
—
3
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
4
Celebrities Fore Kids Inc

The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…

Human Services
5
South Miami Childrens Clinic Inc

Pediatric medical clinic for uninsured and underinsured children

Health
6
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
7
Danny Weinstein Youth Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Miami Marlins Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
9
South Florida Sports Foundation Inc

To support health, education, and volunteerism in south florida, and to improve the lives of people and communities in need.

Youth Development
10
Douglas Gardens Home Care Inc

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to support its parent, miami jewish health systems, inc., a 501(c)(3), by administering a nurse registry program in miami-dade county, florida. the program provides nursing, personal care…

Health
11
The Harvey Milk Foundation Florida Corp
Philanthropy
12
Miami Dade Community Services Inc
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joe Dimaggio Children's Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Personal Ponies Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 · HealthJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INCSYDNEY'S INCREDIBLE DEFEAT OF EWING'S SARCOMA INC: $136,959 · HealthSYDNEY'S INCREDIBLE DEFEAT OF EWING'S SARCOMA INCHERE'S HELP INC: $20,000 · HealthHERE'S HELP INC+2 more: $20,000 · Health+2 moreTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN BROWARD: $77,000 · OtherTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN…YOUTH AUTOMOTIVE TRAINING CENTER OF BROWARD: $30,000 · OtherYOUTH AUTOMOTIVE TRAIN…PARKLAND CARES INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropyPARKLAND …OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTUA FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DAN MARINO FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUDONIS HASLEM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationPersonal Ponies Ltd: $10,000 · Animals
Health$346,959Other$107,000Philanthropy$45,000Youth Development$15,500Human Services$10,000Education$10,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSYDNEY'S INCREDIBLE DEFEAT OF EWING'S SARCOMA INC: $136,959 over 6y, 60% of budgetPARKLAND CARES INC: $45,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetYOUTH AUTOMOTIVE TRAINING CENTER OF BROWARD: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHERE'S HELP INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DAN MARINO FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUDONIS HASLEM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPersonal Ponies Ltd: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTUA FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Miami Foundation IncFL13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jason Taylor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jason Taylor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Here's Help Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jackson Health Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jason Taylor’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home