Loading…
Loading…
Florida · Nonprofit
Personal Ponies Ltd (Florida) is funded by 7 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $67,100 in grants to it, the largest being SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND ($28,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Personal Ponies Ltd is better cushioned than half of the 1,308 animals nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,308 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$500 from 1 funders in 2025, up from $13k and 2 in 2017.
2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 54% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Personal Ponies Ltd’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Personal Ponies Ltd leans on a few funders — its largest provides 42% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 77% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 47% · 2021 56% · 2022 71% · 2023 98% · 2024 100% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Personal Ponies Ltd draws 55% of its grant income from funders outside Florida — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 4 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing