Skip to content
Jasam Foundation of Arizona Fund B at a glance

· Private foundation

Jasam Foundation of Arizona Fund B

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$350k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$552kReligion$520kHuman Services$402kInternational$326kHealth$260kAnimals$191kYouth Development$168kFood & Nutrition$163kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $320k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILITARY YOUTH COMMUNITY MINISTRY$20,000
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
IMMANUEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,000
GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION$20,000
PEO INTERNATIONAL$20,000
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$20,000
ST MATTHEW EPISCOPAL CHURCH$20,000
TUCSON WILDLIFE CENTER$20,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN AZ$20,000
LITERACY CONNECTS$20,000
TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$20,000
FASTADOPT CONNECTIONS$20,000
CASA DE LOS NINOS$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $20k → 15%AVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $18k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $5k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $5k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $5k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $3k → 15%ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $5k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $22k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $22k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $21k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $18k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 31 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
15

Total granted

$2.8M
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+188%

Still filing today

48%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TMC HEALTH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $178k · revenue +390%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    8× · 2017–2024 · $168k · revenue +16%
  • LC
    LITERACY CONNECTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $163k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • SE
    SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION CORPORATION
    one grant, 2018 · $22k
  • ER
    EL RIO FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +682%
  • MU
    MT UNION UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
4
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
5
Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.

Health
6
Children's Clinics for Rehabilitative Services

The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.

Health
7
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
8
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
9
The Arizona Pet Project

The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…

Animals
10
Social Venture Partners Tucson

Svp tucson is an ever expanding community of engaged philanthropists dedicated to building the capacity, strength and impact of nonprofits in addressing social problems. we accomplish this through: thoughtful and strategic investments and…

Philanthropy
11
Sky Island Alliance

We work to connect people, wildlife, and lands across the u.s.-mexico border through the use of science, advocacy, educational activities, community engagement, and on-the-ground conservation initiatives. our main activities include…

Environment
12
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa De Los Ninos; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMMANUEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $173,000 · OtherIMMANUEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $163,000 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC: $163,000 · OtherGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INCMILITARY YOUTH COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $163,000 · OtherMILITARY YOUTH COMMUNITY MINISTRYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $163,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYPEO INTERNATIONAL: $143,000 · OtherPEO INTERNATIONALEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF ST MATTHEW: $105,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF ST MATTHEWARIZONA PUBLIC MEDIA KUAT: $102,000 · OtherARIZONA PUBLIC MEDIA KUATMOUNT UNION COLLEGE: $84,000 · OtherCommunity Food Bank Inc: $163,000 · OtherCommunity Food Bank Inc+21 more: $321,500 · Other+21 moreLITERACY CONNECTS: $163,000 · EducationLITERACY C…DESERT SKY COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $60,000 · EducationDESERT SKY…University of Arizona Foundation: $41,000 · EducationUniversity…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $22,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SI…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $163,000 · Human ServicesAVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $38,000 · Human ServicesGAP MINISTRIES: $18,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesTucson Wildlife Center Inc: $163,000 · AnimalsFriends of Pima Animal Care Center: $28,000 · AnimalsCompassion International Incorporated: $168,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $178,000 · HealthCASA DE LOS NINOS: $163,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,743,500Education$286,500Human Services$224,000Animals$191,000International$183,000Health$178,000Youth Development$163,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $178,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $168,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $163,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCASA DE LOS NINOS: $163,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTucson Wildlife Center Inc: $163,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $163,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $163,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT SKY COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $60,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $41,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $38,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of Pima Animal Care Center: $28,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGAP MINISTRIES: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TMC HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE LOS NINOS ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Wildlife Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds DESERT SKY COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Pima Animal Care Center ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EL RIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GAP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Arizona Community Fou…Connie Hillman Family…United Way of Tucson …The Intuit FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…Eugene C and Wiletta …Margaret E Mooney Fou…The Knisely Family Fo…Fred & Christine Arms…Angel Charity for Chi…The Foster Alliance
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Intuit Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundation · Margaret E Mooney Foundation · The Knisely Family Foundation Inc · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Angel Charity for Children Inc · The Foster Alliance

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jasam Foundation of Arizona Fund B funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jasam Foundation of Arizona Fund B. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jasam Foundation of Arizona Fund B’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home