· Private foundation
Jasam Foundation of Arizona Fund B
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $320k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MILITARY YOUTH COMMUNITY MINISTRY | $20,000 |
| COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $20,000 |
| IMMANUEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $20,000 |
| GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION | $20,000 |
| PEO INTERNATIONAL | $20,000 |
| YOUTH ON THEIR OWN | $20,000 |
| ST MATTHEW EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $20,000 |
| TUCSON WILDLIFE CENTER | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN AZ | $20,000 |
| LITERACY CONNECTS | $20,000 |
| TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| FASTADOPT CONNECTIONS | $20,000 |
| CASA DE LOS NINOS | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $178k · revenue +390%
Compassion International Incorporated8× · 2017–2024 · $168k · revenue +16%- YOYOUTH ON THEIR OWN8× · 2017–2024 · $163k · revenue +138%
Funded once
- SESOCIAL ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION CORPORATIONone grant, 2018 · $22k
- EREL RIO FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +176%
- PIPARTNERS IN HEALTH NAVAJO NATIONone grant, 2021 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.
The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.
Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.
To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.
The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…
Svp tucson is an ever expanding community of engaged philanthropists dedicated to building the capacity, strength and impact of nonprofits in addressing social problems. we accomplish this through: thoughtful and strategic investments and…
We work to connect people, wildlife, and lands across the u.s.-mexico border through the use of science, advocacy, educational activities, community engagement, and on-the-ground conservation initiatives. our main activities include…
Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa De Los Ninos and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TMC HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Tucson Wildlife Center Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA DE LOS NINOS ↗
- Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
- Who funds DESERT SKY COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds AVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Friends of Pima Animal Care Center ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EL RIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GAP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS ↗
- Who funds ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Intuit Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundation · Margaret E Mooney Foundation · The Knisely Family Foundation Inc · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Angel Charity for Children Inc · The Foster Alliance
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jasam Foundation of Arizona Fund B funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.