Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Japanese Chamber of Commerce of Northern California

- promote business, mutual understading, and goodwill between japan and the united states.

$15k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$10kEnvironment$10kRecreation & Sports$10kInternational$4kArts & Culture$2kCommunity Improvement$2kPhilanthropy$1kHuman Services$200
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $8,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAPAN SOCIETY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$3,000
JAPANESE CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$1,800
JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY CONGRESS OF SAN JOSE$1,500
THE SAN FRANCISCO JAPANTOWN FOUNDATION$1,000
APA HERITAGE FOUNDATION$500
SAN FRANCISCO OSAKA SISTER CITY ASSOC$500
KIMOCHI INC$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KIMOCHI INC: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Japantown Cultural Society
Education
2
National Japanese American Historical Society Inc

The National Japanese American Historical Society, Inc. (NJAHS) charitable nonprofit organization dedicated to the collection, preservation, authentic interpretation, and sharing of historical information of the Japanese American…

3
San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center
Arts & Culture
4
Japanese Community Youth Council

The mission of jcyc is to cultivate and enrich the lives of children and youth from diverse, multicultural communities throughout san francisco and beyond. rooted in the japanese american community, jcyc seeks to: provide a comprehensive…

Human Services
5
Nihonmachi Merchants Association

Promote San Francisco's Japantown

6
Japan America Society of So California

The japan america society of southern california works to (1) promote among the american people a more accurate knowledge of the people of japan, their aims, customs, ideals, arts and sciences, industries, economic conditions, and…

International
7
Japanese American Museum of San Jose

The mission of the japanese american museum of san jose is to collect, preserve, and share the japanese american experience of the greater bay area.

Arts & Culture
8
Nikkei Matsuri Foundation Inc

Our mission is to perpetuate the japanese american experiences, cultural customs, and traditions. we do this in part by hosting the annual nikkei matsuri festival in san jose japantown, providing a forum for sharing cultural exhibits and…

Arts & Culture
9
Friends of the Japanese House and Garden

Jasgp inspires mutual curiosity, understanding, and collaboration between japan and the philadelphia region.

Arts & Culture
10
Japanese Friendship Garden and Museum of San Diego Inc

Japanese friendship garden of san diego is a place for visitors to enjoy a japanese style garden. we are dedicated to promoting, presenting and preserving the japanese heritage through educational programs such as arts, culture,…

Environment
11
Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Chicago

The mission of the jccc is to deepen mutual understanding and improve relations between japanese and u.s. businesses through a wide variety of cultural, educational, and charitable programs. to meet its mission, the jccc organizes a series…

12
Asian Pacific Islander Capitol Assn

The Asian Pacific Islander Capitol Association (APICA) is a non-partisan, 501(c)(3) non-profit organization comprised of legislative staffers, advocates, and other API professionals based in the State Capitol community of Sacramento,…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Japanese Cultural and Community Center and the most unlike its peers is Apa Heritage Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO JAPANESE SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO JAPANESE SCHOOLSAN FRANCISCO OSAKA SISTER CITY ASSOC — $500 · OtherSacramento Tree Foundation — $10,000 · EnvironmentSacramento Tree FoundationSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCEJAPANESE CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,800 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE CU…JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY CONGRESS OF SAN JOSE — $1,500 · Arts & CultureJAPANTOWN C…APA HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $500 · Arts & CultureAPA HERITAG…THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $3,000 · InternationalTHE SAN FRANCISCO JAPANTOWN FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyKIMOCHI INC — $200 · Human Services
Other$10,500Environment$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$3,800International$3,000Philanthropy$1,000Human Services$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO JAPANESE SCHOOL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSacramento Tree Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JAPAN SOCIETY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJAPANESE CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJAPANTOWN COMMUNITY CONGRESS OF SAN JOSE — $1,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO JAPANTOWN FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAPA HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKIMOCHI INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Japanese Chamber of Commerce of Northern California funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Japanese Chamber of Commerce of Northern California?

    Find your warmest path to Japanese Chamber of Commerce of Northern California through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $26k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph