Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Texas · Private foundation

Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$40,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$40,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$835k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationHuman Services
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$40k100%
FY20243$38k100%
FY20231$38k100%
FY20221$15k100%
FY20214$38kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$93kYouth Development$29kEnvironment$25kHealth$23kEmployment$14kHuman Services$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Crossroads Charter Schools$38,00010%
Literacy Kansas City$15,00011%
Youth Volunteer Corps$15,00013%
The Launchcode Foundation$14,00010%
Elevate Metro Kc$14,00013%
Gilda's Club Kansas City$10,00012%
Lorraine's House$10,00012%
Kansas City Free Eye Clinic$5,00012%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($48k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCrossroads Charter Schools: $38,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLiteracy Kansas City: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYouth Volunteer Corps: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetThe Launchcode Foundation: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetElevate Metro Kc: $14,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetGilda's Club Kansas City: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLorraine's House: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetKansas City Free Eye Clinic: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…Ewing Marion Kauffman…The Sherman Family Fo…The Kansas City Royal…The H & R Block Found…Health Forward Founda…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The Sherman Family Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation

How much does Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation give?
Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $40,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (48%), Youth Development (15%), Environment (13%).
Who are Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Crossroads Charter Schools ($38k), Literacy Kansas City ($15k), Youth Volunteer Corps ($15k).
Does Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Greater Kansas City Community Foundation, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, The Sherman Family Foundation.
Where is Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation based?
Jane & Jack Strandberg Charitable Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jane & Jack Strandberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home